Search for: "Plaintiff 1 et al v. Wells et al" Results 1 - 20 of 1,693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Plaintiffs’ Copyright Infringement Theories Training the AI Requires Copying Copyrighted Works Most of the plaintiffs in the cases, with the notable exception of Doe 1 v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:07 pm by Steven Cohen
Honda Motor Company, Ltd. et al – United States District Court – District of Vermont – May 15, 2024) involves a product liability claim. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
What followed did go well for Wells or the plaintiffs’ claims.[11] Judge Rosenstengel has written an opinion that may be the first careful judicial consideration of the basic requirements of systematic review. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
The first, the Sixth Circuit’s “authority or duty” test, required plaintiffs to prove “state action” by establishing that either (1) the “text of state law requires an officeholder to maintain a social-media account,” (2) the defendant official “use[s] … state resources” or “government staff” to run the account, or (3) the “accoun[t] belong[s] to an office, rather than an individual officeholder. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]