Search for: "Robert J. Walters" Results 1 - 20 of 333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Carson Turner
In an article for the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Christopher J. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
 Pix credit here For those of you who have been following my step by step encounter with Jan Broekman's path-breaking book,  Knowledge in Change: The Semiotics of Cognition and Conversation (Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2023), I am happy to announce that the entire work is now ready for review as a discussion draft.The abstract described my intentions: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called… [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm by Josh Blackman
" And in 1996, Walter Dellinger, as head of OLC, repudiated Barr's views. [read post]
20 May 2023, 6:29 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
With less than 2 weeks to go before 1 June 2023, it was about time for the UPC to tie several loose ends and to clarify various questions before becoming (more or less) fully operative. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
” At first instance, Meade J held that the Patent was invalid for lack of plausibility and lack of technical contribution over the prior art. [read post]
5 May 2023, 5:38 am by Bart van Wezenbeek (Hoffmann Eitle)
An appellant who gives a debit order for payment of the reduced appeal fee even though it clearly does not meet the conditions of Rule 6(4,5) EPC commits an obvious mistake in the meaning of J 8/80 and G 1/12. [read post]
  As Hacon J explained at paragraph 280, “Culpa in contrahendo can be translated as “fault in the formation of a contract”. [read post]