Search for: "Robert S Kant"
Results 1 - 20
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
All of the great moral and political philosopher, from Plato and Aristotle, through Hobbes, Hume, Kant, Bentham, and Mill, to contemporary figures like Thomas Scanlon and Derek Parfit have engaged in debates about the nature of the human good. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
They fall within the cluster of moral views sometimes associated with Immanuel Kant. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:59 am
Editor’s Note: This article is part of our Ending Perpetual War Symposium. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
Back in 2011, at a Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference, Chief Justice John Roberts took a cheap shot at law professors and law reviews when he intoned: “Pick up a copy of any law review that you see, and the first article is likely to be, you know, the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th Century Bulgaria, or something, which I’m sure was of great interest to the academic that wrote it, but isn’t of much help to the bar. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 4:58 pm
Contents include: Marc de Wilde, Allying with Unbelievers: Hugo Grotius’s Letters to East-Indian Rulers Adam Strobeyko, The Person of the State: The Anthropomorphic Subject of the Law of Nations Christopher Szabla, Civilising Violence: International Law and Colonial War in the British Empire, 1850–1900 Robert Schütze, German Idealism after Kant: Nineteenth-Century Foundations of International Law Book Reviews – Symposium on Symposium on… [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:06 am
Robert Nozick’s Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974) is the most important scholarly work of libertarian philosophy. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:19 pm
Both Chief Justice John Roberts and at-long-last-retired Justice Stephen Breyer have complained in recent years about how an overemphasis on niche topics like, as Roberts put it, “the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th-century Bulgaria” has left much of legal scholarship unresponsive to the real-world problems that they, as judges, ostensibly have to deal with. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
” S. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:53 pm
Chief Justice Roberts said that Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar's position was "fairly radical. [read post]
15 May 2022, 6:00 am
All of the great moral and political philosopher, from Plato and Aristotle, through Hobbes, Hume, Kant, Bentham, and Mill, to contemporary figures like Thomas Scanlon and Derek Parfit have engaged in debates about the nature of the human good. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
At oral argument, that possibility was explored by at least one Justice, Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 7:02 am
Broekman unveiled in his 1961/63 “Phänomenologie und Egologie” how Husserl analyzed the “Split Ego”–thoughts in Kant’s vision, which became fundamental for his phenomenology. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm
" Baude relies on Roberts's NFIB opinion, which is based on Chief Justice Marshall's McCulloch decision! [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:30 am
However, most probably also remember Chief Justice Roberts’ 2011 comment that an article about “the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in Eighteenth Century Bulgaria or something…isn’t of much help to the bar. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 10:51 am
See Kant v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 9:37 am
” A passage from Immanuel Kant’s The Critique of Pure Reason (1781) is often paraphrased as “theory without practice is empty and practice without theory is blind. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 1:37 am
” A passage from Immanuel Kant’s The Critique of Pure Reason (1781) is often paraphrased as “theory without practice is empty and practice without theory is blind. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
Disagreeing with Kant, they believed that there was no objective foundation for science. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 1:33 pm
Robert E. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
A lawyer’s ethical obligations are grounded in that basic fidelity and they may advance their client’s interests only consistent with this higher duty. [read post]
