Search for: "Ronald H. Roberts" Results 1 - 20 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 8:11 am by Brian Albrecht
Besides Ronald Coase, Alchian is the figure at the lead of these important schools of thought. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Circuit in 1987 by President Ronald Reagan, and he took senior status in 2013. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:55 pm
 Pix Credit here At the invitation of my publisher I have been working on the production of a comprehensive commentary of the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
And, of course, I am also immensely grateful to H. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:22 pm by Bill Henderson
Stable, transparent, not very complicated, reasonably profitable, and often quite collegial. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]