Search for: "Saint-Gobain Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2022, 1:09 pm
Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
This was a claim for revocation of European Patent (UK) 2 373 755 (“the Patent”) by Saint-Gobain (“SG”). 3M was the holder of the patent, which was titled “Dish-shaped abrasive particles with a recessed surface” and had a priority date of 17 December 2008. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 3:30 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the plaintiff alleged that his employer retaliated against him for complaining about wage and hour practices. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc. v Unova Indus. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 431 F. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 431 F. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 2:50 am
Since “[t]he Board generally does not consider briefs that exceed the page limit” (see Saint-Gobain Corp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:00 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. et al., No. 16-cv-242, 2017 WL 6043956 (D.N.H. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Brown v Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:55 pm
Saint-Gobain Corp., 572 F.3d 1371, 1380 (Fed.Cir. 2009) (“[U]nsworn attorney argument . . . is notevidence and cannot rebut . . . other admitted evidence. . . . [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Supreme Court directed that a complaint “must be sufficiently clear and detailed for a reasonable employer to understand it, in light of both content and context, as an assertion of rights protected by the statute and a call for their protection. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:26 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 131 S.Ct. 1325 (2011), which held that oral complaints were adequate, so long as the complaint is “sufficiently clear and detailed for a reasonable employer to understand it, in light of both content and context, as an assertion of rights protected by the statute and a call for their protection. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:00 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:59 pm
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., that oral complaints of a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act can constitute protected activity under the FLSA’s anti-retaliation provision. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:45 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Second Circuit concluded that not only does an oral complaint suffice, as the High Court held in Kasten, but also an oral complaint made to the employer, rather than only to a government entity, would be enough. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:21 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., which held that oral complaints are covered under the FLSA’s anti-retaliation provision, the High Court expressly declined to resolve the separate question of whether “complaints made directly to an employer” (be they oral or written) fall within the statute’s scope—or if instead the statute protects only “formal complaints made to an administrative or governmental authority. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:38 am
From the majority’s perspective the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kasten v Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. did not change things. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Saint-Gobain Corp., 572 F.3d 1371, 1380 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
While the Seventh Circuit has not addressed the exact parameters of what constitutes a “complaint,” the Supreme Court stated in Kasten v Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp, that a complaint must give the employer fair notice that a grievance has been lodged against it. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 131 S. [read post]
