Search for: "Smith v. Revenue Collect et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Smith v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
The term does not include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages, or tobacco, as those terms are defined or used in subtitle E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit margins were so… [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Despite these clinical symptoms, no cultures were sent to the lab and no stool sample was collected. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
With about 52 million Americans who filed their taxes, over 45 million of them collected some sort of a refund, according to the Internal Revenue service. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
The SEC alleged that Tilton and Patriarch were able to collect excessive management fees and retain control over their funds’ operation by failing to follow the valuation methodology that was laid out in their investment documents. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am
Smith-Wythe Airport Commission, et al. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm
Johnson et al. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
”Christopher Buccafusco (Chicago-Kent)Topic: Translating Piracy’s Effect on Sales into Piracy’s Effect on Creative Incentives, Commenting on Commenting on: Brett Danaher & Michael Smith, Gone in 60 Seconds: The Impact of the Megaupload Shutdown on Movie Sales (2013), Christian Peukert et al., Piracy and Movie Revenues: Evidence from Megaupload, A Tale of the Long Tail? [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Landow Aviation LP, et al. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Hence, posthumous collections, such as The Selected Papers of John Jay (2010) are not counted. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
Matosantos as Director et al. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
Matosantos as Director et al. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
Matosantos as Director et al. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
http://j.st/pCf Miller, et al. v. [read post]
