Search for: "Taco Bell Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am by Eric Goldman
Taco Bell Corp., 256 F.3d 446 (6th Cir. 2001), the court found that: if the promise [in a contract] amounts only to a promise to refrain from reproducing, performing, distributing or displaying the work, then the contract claim is preempted. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am by Guangjian Tu
Summary of the Fact This case concerned a class action initiated by a former employee, Morgan against Sundance Incorporate (the owner of a Taco Bell franchise restaurant, hereinafter “Company”) regarding the arrear of overtime payment in the context of Federal law of the USA. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 12:17 pm by Andrew Hamm
In this case, Robyn Morgan, who worked at a Taco Bell franchise owned by Sundance, Inc., filed a putative class action in federal court under the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 3:40 pm by Craig R. Tractenberg
Yum Brands, a publicly held owner of various brands reports same store sales increases for its US operations, including KFC up 9%, Pizza Hut up 6% and Taco Bell up 3%. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 127 AD3d 850, 851 [2015]; see Phillips v Taco Bell Corp., 152 AD3d 806, 807 [2017]; Prott v Lewin & Baglio, LLP, 150 AD3d 908, 909 [2017]; Gawrych v Astoria Fed. [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:39 pm by Anthony Zaller
  One case involved Taco Bell where the plaintiffs’ alleged that Taco Bell’s policy of requiring employees to remain on the company’s premises while eating a discounted meal prevented the employees from being relieved for a meal break. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:06 pm by Anthony Zaller
Taco Bell Corp., 896 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2018), an employee brought a putative class action alleging that Taco Bell’s discounted meal policy effectively denied employees the ability to take a duty free meal break. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 12:18 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Taco Bell Confirmatory Opt-Out Text Message Doesn’t Violate TCPA – Ibey v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 127 AD3d 850, 851; see Phillips v Taco Bell Corp., 152 AD3d 806, 807; Prott v Lewin & Baglio, LLP, 150 AD3d 908, 909; Gawrych v Astoria Fed. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
In case you missed the in-depth coverage of Employment Law Daily for July, here’s a recap of some key developments in the L&E community. [read post]