Search for: "The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Among its signatories are major patent applicants to the EPO in recent years, such as Deutsche Telekom, Hoffmann-La Roche, HP, Eriksonn, Nokia, Procter & Gamble, Syngenta and Qualcomm. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
The paper was not designed or titled to mislead anyone into thinking it would be a consideration of arguments for and against extrapolation from (non-human) animal studies to human beings. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 11:23 am by kblocher@hslf.org
The Humane Cosmetics Act, federal legislation to ban production and sale of animal-tested cosmetics in the U.S. recently reintroduced in the House of Representatives, currently has more than 200 bipartisan cosponsors and the support of 400 individual cosmetics companies, in addition to the Personal Care Products Council—the leading national trade association representing 600 global cosmetics and personal care products companies. [read post]
26 May 2023, 9:35 am by Bridget Crawford
  Procter & Gamble, which owns the Always brand, did not reply to requests for comment. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 3:18 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
  In addition to data driven analysis, Smarter Collaboration also includes a number of examples of how companies and law firms thrive through the use of Smarter Collaboration. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Earlier this summer, some of the world’s biggest tech, product and branding companies (including Google, Facebook, Unilever and Procter & Gamble) launched The Global Alliance for Responsible Media. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“The Issue with Tissue” reveals Procter & Gamble, Kimberly-Clark, and Georgia-Pacific use zero recycled content in their at-home toilet paper, instead relying on ancient trees clear-cut from the Canadian boreal forest (the “Amazon of the North”). [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:16 am by Phyllis H. Marcus and Emma Lewis
Procter & Gamble to Pare Competitive Claims for Charmin Ultra Mega Rolls NAD also recommended that The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) discontinue certain claims regarding its Charmin products. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
” On this last point, Deborah Platt Majoras, currently Chief Legal Officer at Procter & Gamble and former Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, said, Give me the advice. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am by Reuel Schiller
Steel, American Tobacco, the Association of American Railroads, Procter and Gamble, Chrysler) and (as the pamphlet reveals) the California and Ohio Republican parties.Not a Baker's Right-to-Work PamphletAuthor's Collectionlot has been written about Baker. [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:26 pm by James Galvin
The issuer is not required to maintain a secondary market, and, like most structured products, there may be no buyer if the investor needed to liquidate the RCN prior to maturity. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “The Patent Medicine Conspiracy Against Freedom of the Press”—the standard ad contract between patent medicine companies and newspapers declared it subject to cancellation if any material detrimental to company’s interests is permitted to appear anywhere in the paper. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:55 am by Tiffany Blofield
CLEAN® by the internal team at Procter & Gamble and the outside agency was another presentation topic. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:01 am by Aditi Kapoor
The company responsible for the technology behind the ‘invisible’ paper-thin screen is Americhip. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:01 am by Aditi Kapoor
The company responsible for the technology behind the ‘invisible’ paper-thin screen is Americhip. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:52 am by Doug Cornelius
Procter & Gamble came up with a powerful product. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
The court also granted summary judgment of noninfringement under the doctrine of equivalents because it found that ACI had failed to provide particularized testimony and linking argument as to the equivalency of the Radio patent and the accused product. [read post]