Search for: "USA v. Dunn" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of  a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by William C. MacLeod and Darby Hobbs
  Some called for Congress to restore the FTC’s authority to seek monetary remedies for deceptive practices under 13(b), which the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Eric Columbus
He points to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Rulings IPSO has released two resolution statements and the following rulings: 04467-19 Law MP v The Daily Record, Clause 2 (Privacy), No breach after investigation 06020-19 Wilkins v The Daily Telegraph, Clauses 1 Accuracy (2018) and 3 Harassment (2018), no breach after investigation Resolution Statement 07191-19 Cintra Estates v Mail Online, Clause 1 Accuracy (2019) Resolution Statement 07016-19 Fryer v Great Yarmouth Mercury, Clause 2 Privacy (2019),… [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:32 am by neli
 And audio recordings of Supreme Court oral arguments, taken from the LII’s Oyez site, are an important part of “Roe”, Lisa Loomer’s play about Roe v Wade. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
At Truthdig, Bill Blum maintains that “several parties will share the blame” if the state of Alabama carries out the execution of Vernon Madison, whose habeas claim the Supreme Court denied last week in Dunn v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 11:11 am by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court's November 6th per curiam decision in Dunn v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that in one of the summary reversals, Dunn v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Dunn, the court found that Alabama had denied a death-penalty defendant the expert mental-health assistance to which he was entitled under the standard the court established in Ake v. [read post]