Search for: "United States of America v. Rife"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 am
Defendants, citing United States v Bertie Ambulance Serv. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
On the ninth day of jury selection in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
” It is formally named the “Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Board of Education; Ely was less taken by the Court's ability to discern substantive values, but he did strongly believe that the duty to monitor the basic procedures of the republic and to engage in “representation reinforcement” to protect marginalized groups who could not in fact participate adequately in America’s system of interest-group politics (even if, as we have recently been reminded, he vociferously opposed Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am
Antitrust Matters provides engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
[David Bernstein] Do the Ethnic Categories Used by Universities for "Diversity" Purposes Make Sense?
4 May 2022, 3:50 pm
As Michael Omi and Howard Winant, two of the leading sociologists of race in the United States, point out: "These racial categories are rife with inconsistencies and lack parallel construction. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Since the mid-1970s, he has been deeply pessimistic about the possibilities of political change: Political action of any sort, he believes, cannot improve or ameliorate the condition of black people in the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
WadeandPlanned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
They worried so much about a president acting for personal financial gain, rather than exclusively for the interests of the United States, that they forbid it in the Constitution three times. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
Ransomware attacks have grown almost exponentially for several reasons: The ransomware business model works, with the FBI stating that ransomware is on pace to become a one billion dollar source of income for cybercriminals in 2017; Ransomware start-up costs are cheap. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
But in a recent ruling, in Sessions v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
The Constitution generally does not protect noncitizens abroad who have no previous ties to the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm
*** Truman Administration In 1947, the United States was one of two dominant superpowers on the global stage. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
But the CVD law and its application are rife with problems. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am
Overt race, gender, disability, and age discrimination and homophobia were rife in America. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
United States, the Court -- notwithstanding the ludicrous claims of victory from AZ Gov. [read post]
