Search for: "United States of America v. Various Works of Art" Results 1 - 20 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
• ParticipantsThe following may send representatives, without the right to vote and at the charge of their corresponding administrative budgets:- Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;- Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe;- European Court of Human Rights;- Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe;- Conference of INGOs of the Council of Europe;- Eurimages;- European Audiovisual Observatory;- Committees or other bodies of the Council of… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
  As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
By 1868, the First Insurrection was deeply seared into America's historical memory. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
In the three hour period when Munoz was at the park and was faced with various scary characters, including ten occasions where guests screamed and ran from the jump scares. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am by Whitney Gravelle
Canada and the United States have an obligation to respect and protect human rights. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing… [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
Even fine art was not immune to his critique: nudity was taboo, under all circumstances; and the fact that it considered itself “art” was no excuse. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Selikoff advanced his scientific and political agenda by promoting his reputation and work, and he thus put his credentials, work, and methods into issue. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]