Search for: "Unknown Defendants 1-10" Results 1 - 20 of 908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2024, 5:55 am by itars sis
Thus, in the span of a couple of years (2018 to 2020), the US company has gone from disclosing[11] the use of BooksCorpus[12] (a dataset of 7,000 self-published books retrieved from smashwords.com, which are largely protected under copyright)[13] for the training of GPT-1 (released in June 2018), to indicating the use of several vaguely labeled datasets to train GPT-3 (released in July 2020), including two internet-based books corpora (Books1 and Books2).[14] Although the content of Books1… [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
He held that the Deputy Master was wrong to find that the Defendant had an unanswerable defence to the defamation claim of consent; the claim should not have been summarily dismissed. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am by Russell Knight
Ingram, 2015 IL App (1st) 142439 (10 ½ month delay); Long v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) is the corporate entity defending the case brought by the likes of Prince Harry, Sir Elton John and Doreen Lawrence. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
The request's theory is that the post violated the copyright in a tumblr post, https://www.tumblr.com/case49news/745091056157196289/fourth-circuit-on-one-sided-pseudonymity-in-sexual: Re: Unknown NOTICE TYPE:DMCA Copyright claim 1 KIND OF WORK: Unspecified DESCRIPTION[:] [REDACTED] ORIGINAL URLS: https://www.tumblr.com/case49news/745091056157196289/fourth-circuit-on-one-sided-pseudonymity-in-sexual ALLEGEDLY INFRINGING URLS:… [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
On 1 May 2024, the High Court handed down judgement in the data protection case of McLoughlin v Chief Constable of Kent Police [2024] EWHC 990 (KB). [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
On Wednesday, Google received a request that it remove that post from its indexes—and thus vanish it from search results—on the theory that the post violated the copyright in a blog post, https://europeannewschannels.blogspot.com/2024/01/fourth-circuit-on-one-sided.html: Re: Unknown NOTICE TYPE: DMCA Copyright claim 1 KIND OF WORK: Unspecified DESCRIPTION[:] The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by default judgment) to… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The title of the play was suggested by one of the theater actors and it refers to the colors that are stereotypically considered “feminine” or “masculine”. [10] Moreover, as Yulia mentioned in one of her interviews, the theater operated on a “horizontal” basis, meaning that each child actively participated in creating the performances and even had the opportunity to direct parts of the scenes. [11] On March 11-12, 2019, police visited the schools, where… [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Last week, Google received two requests that it remove that post from its indexes—and thus vanish it from search results—on the theory that the post violated the copyright in a Tumblr post, https://www.tumblr.com/case49news/745091056157196289/fourth-circuit-on-one-sided-pseudonymity-in-sexual: Re: Unknown NOTICE TYPE: DMCA Copyright claim 1 KIND OF WORK: Unspecified DESCRIPTION    The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already… [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am by Eugene Volokh
"Civ.R. 10(A) requires plaintiffs to provide their names and addresses in the captions of their complaints. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
However, this time, Bouvier was not a defendant in this case. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Equally important is to identify the questions and unknowns that remain, which are substantial. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am by Thalia Kruger
During the time that the merits were being assessed by the Commission, the applicant presented two requests for precautionary measures and only the second one was adopted by the Resolución nº 29/19 on 10 May 2019. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
A domestic relations order  dated November 1, 2005, similarly provided that the plaintiff would receive a marital share of the defendant’s retirement benefits “at such time as [he] has retired and is actually receiving a regular service retirement allowance. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
The circumstances of the deaths and injuries are unknown and the health ministry did not elaborate. [read post]