Search for: "Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA"
Results 1 - 20
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm
The new laws compiled below add to that already very green environmental regulatory scheme. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
” See, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:54 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
For example, in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:53 am
Unlike them industry is pitching this as a normal regulatory disagreement and claims to share EPA’s goals. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
” Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:49 am
Id., at ___, ___ (quoting Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:46 am
In that case, the Court found that the EPA did not have authority under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act to promulgate emissions caps. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Wagner, University of Texas at Austin School of Law Court disregards the Clean Air Act’s clear language in applying the major questions doctrine to curb EPA’s climate authority. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 9:36 am
Before West Virginia, some scholars began calling the doctrine a clear-statement rule, particularly after the Court referred to the lack of “clear congressional authorization” for the agency action in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
" See Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:36 am
Supreme Court in Whitman v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm
Oregon, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
AT&T, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:00 am
(citing Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Second, we present evidence on public-company disclosures consistent with issuers’ understanding that the SEC has long had authority to take regulatory action in this area. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am
Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
Here is the cited passage from the Alabama case: We expect Congress to speak clearly when authorizing an agency to exercise powers of "vast 'economic and political significance.'" Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:53 am
.'" Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]