Search for: "Utility Partners, L.L.C." Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2022, 12:12 pm by gabrielagendreau
Interested candidates should submit letters of interest and statements of qualifications by March 18, 2022 to: Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi, c/o Robyn Burlingham | 1485 Mno-Bmadzewen Way | Fulton, Michigan 49052 | ATTN: Waséyabek Development Company, L.L.C. | With Copy to: Waséyabek Development Company, L.L.C. | 16 Monroe Center Drive NE, Suite 200 | Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503 | ATTN: Deidra… [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm by MOTP
VICKIE FORBY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated in Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ONE TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., ONE TECHNOLOGIES MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.; ONE TECHNOLOGIES CAPITAL, L.L.P., Defendants-Appellees. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Wolfgang Demino
Texas Supreme Court to hear oral argument on Tuesday, October 10, 2017 in client's fee fight with his former attorney following conclusion of drawn-out fight over inheritance money. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 10:55 am by Steven Boutwell
Merger:  The Louisiana Public Utility Commission (“LPSC”) approved a joint application of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
  Details below, "borrowed" from my partner, Robert H. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am by Devlin Hartline
I think the answer is clearly “yes,” and how I get there is by utilizing the only bright-line rule under the volitional conduct test. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm by Employment Lawyers
  While such complaints are processed utilizing the same EEO complaint process and time frames – including an ADR program, an EEO investigation and issuance of a final Agency decision – the Department of Justice process allows for fewer remedies and does not include the right to request a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge or the right to appeal the final Agency decision to the Commission. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:08 pm by Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz
Evans, Partner, Jones Day (confirmed) Jeffrey Manber, Managing Director, NanoRacks, LLC   (confirmed) Thomas P. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:08 pm by Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz
Lewis, Technology Transactions  Attorney  (confirmed) Jones Day, Giovanna Cinelli, Partner and Delbert D. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:00 pm by Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz
Lewis, Technology Transactions  Attorney  (confirmed) Jones Day, Giovanna Cinelli, Partner and Delbert D. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
“The court recognizes the difficulties presented by § 1129(b)(2)(A) for real estate developers trying to reorganize, but Congress has decided that debtors must bear the risk of reorganization by contributing additional capital and/or pledging additional collateral to their undersecured creditors before debtors may enjoy the benefits of a confirmed plan. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Bejger, Chief Compliance Officer, Providence Equity Partners L.L.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
., and its wholly owned subsidiary Corr Wireless Communications, L.L.C., filed their complaint. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Appellant, Roberto Ramos, filed suit against appellees, Javier Perez, individually, Hook and Lateral Investments, L.L.C., Livex and Agro, L.L.C., Monte Bonito, L.L.C., Northgate Real Estate Group, L.L.C., P&L Partners, L.L.C., Paradise Rio Carwash, G.P., L.L.C., Sharyland Investors, Ltd., and the Shary Group, L.L.C. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 1:28 am by Randall Reese
Motion for Continuation of Utility Service and Approval of Adequate Assurance of Payment to Utility Company Under Section 366(b) Emergency Motion Of Debtors For An Interim And Final Order To (I) Prohibit Utility Companies From Discontinuing, Altering, Or Refusing Service; (II) Deem Utility Companies Adequately Assured Of Future Payment And (III) Establish Procedures For Determining Requests For Additional Adequate Assurance Filed by Debtor Seahawk Drilling, Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 8:16 am
Beck Partners, L.L.C., the claims of a psychiatric patient, Denise Horton, were dismissed because she did not first submit her claims to a medical review panel. [read post]