Search for: "VIKING PUMPS"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 12:28 am
A total of 20 consistory court judgments were circulated in 2024 and this first part includes summaries of judgments on Procedure and Reordering, extensions and other building works and Organs. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:09 pm
The policy contemplates coverage for periods when plaintiff would have some temporary access to the property, including periods involving potential partial resumption of operations to mitigate damages, which for plaintiff included maintaining its extensive plantings (see generally Matter of Viking Pump., Inc., 27 NY3d 244, 257 [2016]; Westchester Fire Ins. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:09 pm
The policy contemplates coverage for periods when plaintiff would have some temporary access to the property, including periods involving potential partial resumption of operations to mitigate damages, which for plaintiff included maintaining its extensive plantings (see generally Matter of Viking Pump., Inc., 27 NY3d 244, 257 [2016]; Westchester Fire Ins. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:48 pm
Although less expensive than premium brands like Viking, Frigidaire sells appliances like its dishwashers at a considerable premium over competitive offerings. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:20 am
In recent years, groups like the white supremacist Rise Above Movement (RAM) popularized packaging nationalist ideals into adrenaline-pumping mixed martial arts clubs. [read post]
Delaware Superior Court Requires Contract Claim Be Plead For Prejudgment Interest To Start To Accrue
7 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Viking Pump Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:34 am
The court held that it was bound by Matter of Viking Pump, 33 N.Y.S.3d 118 (N.Y. 2016), because, in Hopeman, as in Viking Pump, the policies all contained “non-cumulation clauses” which require application of all sums allocation. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 11:06 am
As Ahmad noted, the KeySpan appeal “shows that the Viking Pump ruling can raise many more questions than it raises. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 11:06 am
As Ahmad noted, the KeySpan appeal “shows that the Viking Pump ruling can raise many more questions than it raises. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:13 am
The ruling adopted the principles articulated by New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, in last year’s landmark Viking Pump decision. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:13 am
The ruling adopted the principles articulated by New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, in last year’s landmark Viking Pump decision. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:15 am
Because the district court had applied a pro rata allocation based on pre-Viking Pump case law, the Second Circuit remanded for the district court to recalculate damages. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:15 am
Because the district court had applied a pro rata allocation based on pre-Viking Pump case law, the Second Circuit remanded for the district court to recalculate damages. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:00 am
On July 17, the U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
Insurance coverage law continued to evolve through 2016. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:48 am
Decision Finally Clarified by Delaware Supreme Court In re Viking Pump, Inc. and Warren Pumps, LLC Insurance Appeals, No. 518, 523, 525, 528, 2014, N10C-06-141, C.A. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 6:59 am
The Delaware Supreme Court ruled on Monday in a long-running dispute involving Viking Pump’s and Warren Pumps’ claims for recovery under primary, umbrella, and excess insurance. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:18 pm
The hovering Trump, bedecked with the phallic tongue of a violet Celtic floral tie, is in Viking mode, looking like a triumphant dragon on the thrusting prow of a long boat. [read post]
11 May 2016, 6:34 am
The decision, in In the Matter of Viking Pump, Inc. and Warren Pumps, LLC, Insurance Appeals, comes in response to two questions certified from the Delaware Supreme Court: Under New York law, is the proper method of allocation to be used all sums or pro- rata when there are non-cumulation and prior insurance provisions? [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:42 am
In the Matter of Viking Pump, the Court of Appeals clarified its position regarding allocation of coverage for asbestos exposure claims over multiple policy years involving multiple insurers, as well as whether "vertical exhaustion" is necessary to trigger next-level excess coverage -- finding that allocation is dependent upon the policy language and only "vertical exhaustion" is necessary to trigger excess coverage. [read post]
