Search for: "Wagner v. King" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  He dismissed the claim for state immunity brought by the former King of Spain. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
 Dado, La Grande Ferme--Homage à Bernard Réquichot (1962-3); CentrePompidou  It was my great honor to have been asked to participate in the brilliant Conference "The Life and Work of Robert M. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the holding in Blum v Perlstein (47 AD3d 741 [2d Dept 2008]) which cited to this Court’s decisions in Berkowitz v Fischbein, Badillo, Wagner & Harding (7 AD3d 385 [1st Dept 2004]) and Argyle Capital Mgt. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 11:30 am
Balsamic vinegar: more delicious than it looks Trivia of the day (courtesy of the AG)Your pub quiz team will thank you:In Wagner's final opera, Parsifal, Amfortas (King of the Grail Knights) receives balsam brought from Arabia, in order to ease the pain from a self-inflicted wound from his holy spear. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Pharmaceutical Pricing Jaime King, University of California Hastings College of the Law, The Burden of Federalism: Challenges to State Attempts at Controlling Prescription Drug Costs Marc Rodwin, Suffolk University Law School, Controlling Pharmaceutical Prices: What the U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Magazine ($4.6m including economic loss, later reduced by $3.9m), Wagners v Alan Jones ($3.7m) and now Rush v Daily Telegraph (judgment reserved) are not the whole story. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:42 am by Marty Lederman
 In discovery, Ali's lawyers (including Michael Meltsner and Ann Wagner) uncovered that the Commission had, in fact, granted, renewed or reinstated boxing licenses on at least 244 occasions to boxers who had been convicted of one or more felonies, misdemeanors or military offenses involving moral turpitude.That showing led Judge Walter Mansfield, to whom the case had been reassigned, to hold that the withdrawal of Ali's license violated the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]