Search for: "White v. Department of Defense"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm
Department of Commerce. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 2:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
Whether the police department is liable for that is a question for remand. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
Justifying the killing or harming of Palestinians in the name of protecting another nation's security, or on the theory that it is acceptable collateral damage in the other nation's defensive operations. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
” Mark Esper, Trump’s former defense secretary, has warned of “more … hyper-aggressive behavior” by Trump if he takes office, recounting when Trump asked if demonstrators gathering around the White House following the death of George Floyd could be shot. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
"This is the strength we need back in the White House! [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
The trial was recently the center of TV series “The People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
On February 28, 2024, President Biden announced an Executive Order (“EO”) directing the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to promulgate regulations that restrict or prohibit transactions involving certain bulk sensitive personal data or United States Government-related data and countries of concern or covered persons. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
One need look no further than last week’s sentencing of Samuel Bankman-Fried to see the impact of noncompliance.[12] In advance of the sentencing, the Department of Justice filed hundreds of victim statements with the court.[13] The victim statements reflect the incredibly broad cross-section of people who were harmed by the fraud that Bankman-Fried was convicted of: single parents, retirees, young people, grandparents. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:04 am
From Erikson v. [read post]
The Supreme Court Cannot Ignore the National Security Implications of the So-Called ‘Jawboning’ Case
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Mary McCord is one of the counsel representing former superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services Maria Vullo in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 12:01 am
Griggs v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
" It is even possible that the Trump Justice Department will vigorously argue that the President is not covered by Section 3. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
Justices White, Powell, Stevens, and Blackmun voted to reverse. [read post]
