Search for: "Wildlife Farms II LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
State Farm Gen. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drough [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Caltrans refused and petitioners filed suit on November 1, 2017, alleging (i) that Caltrans improperly relied on section 103, (ii) that the department is estopped from relying on the 35-day statute of limitations period, and (iii) additional claims on the merits of the adequacy of the FEIR for the project. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 4:50 pm
§ 1539(a)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:21 pm
Leflar; Law Clerk, McMath Woods, P.A.; Public Interest Extern, Attorney General for the Cherokee Nation; Corporate Extern, Walmart Stores, Inc.; Law Clerk, Mostyn Prettyman; Pro Bono Law Clerk, Legal Aid of Arkansas; Research Intern, Nature Conservancy; Consultant, Arkansas Wildlife FederationDistance LL.M. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
On March 26 and 27, the Court will hear oral argument in the same-sex marriage cases, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
II. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
” Runoff from farms north of the Everglades has been blamed as the largest source of the excess phosphorus. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 20, 2010 Subject to court approval, Cardi Materials, LLC of Warwick, R.I., will pay a $55,000 civil penalty and perform an additional project costing $168,500 to resolve numerous violations of the Clean Water Act at its Warwick concrete manufacturing facility. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
EPA’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at EPA Region II, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007–1866. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
On or about October 22, 2009, Wildearth Guardians filed an amended complaint alleging that EPA Administrator Jackson failed to comply with a mandatory duty to fully or partially approve or disapprove State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions from the States of Colorado, Montana, New Mexico and Utah within the time frame required by section 110(k)(2) of the Act and asking the court to enter judgment providing: (i) A declaration that EPA has violated and continues to violate the Act by failing to… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The other three defendants include the City of West Point, West Point Dairy Products, LLC, (WPDP); and Wimmers Meat Products, Inc. [read post]
