Search for: "XYZ Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
In February, I wrote about a Fourth Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
In February, I wrote about a Fourth Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Last month, I wrote about a Fourth Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
" Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
[The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by default judgment) to have committed the assault, but Judge Wilkinson's concurrence argues that, absent this unusual factor, one-sided pseudonymity should be frowned on.] [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:34 am
Potential client sits down with business divorce lawyer and says, “I’m a minority shareholder in XYZ Corp. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
I thought I'd pass along amicus brief that I submitted earlier this month in Doe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:13 am
Traditional pseudonyms, such as John and Jane Doe, Richard Roe, Paul and Pauline Poe (or even Francis Foe, Walter Woe, or Xerxes Xoe3), XYZ Co., Anonymous, or the archaic Noakes or Stiles.4 Unsurprisingly, there are other names that are used in other Anglophone legal systems, for instance “Ashok Kumar” for unnamed defendants in Indian copyright litigation, and that are likely to make their way into American court one day.5 Fictitious pseudonyms, unrelated to the… [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
There are many options, including: Traditional pseudonyms, such as John and Jane Doe, Richard Roe, Paul and Pauline Poe (or even Francis Foe, Walter Woe, or Xerxes Xoe3), XYZ Co., Anonymous, or the archaic Noakes or Stiles.4 Unsurprisingly, there are other names that are used in other Anglophone legal systems, for instance "Ashok Kumar" for unnamed defendants in Indian copyright litigation, and that are likely to make their way into American court one day.5 Fictitious… [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:48 pm
So say, for example, the plaintiff alleges that XYZ Corp. was the RICO enterprise and also names XYZ Corp. as the defendant. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am
XYZ Corp., 282 N.J. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:03 pm
In other words, a plaintiff generally cannot sue XYZ Corp. for civil RICO damages and also assert that XYZ Corp. was the RICO enterprise. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 1:14 pm
If the evidence indicated that the boiler, manufactured by XYZ Corp., was defective and that ABC’s maintenance-and-repair contractor, PDQ Inc., should have spotted and addressed the problem but did not, then you could have very significant and potentially successful third-party industrial accident claims against XYZ, PDQ, or both. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 6:25 pm
“It’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]