Search for: "ADAM S. GOLDSTEIN"
Results 181 - 200
of 494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2019, 3:55 am
Ronald Mann had this blog’s preview. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:07 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman “[m]easur[es] varying levels of complexity” in the Supreme Court’s opinions this term. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am
It’s about what the government can do, not just who runs it. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Further coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Pete Williams and Erin McClam of NBC News, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Richard Wolf and Brad Heath of USA Today, Bill Mears of CNN, Fox News, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, Stephanie Condon of CBS News, Martin J. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am
Jordan Teicher of New York Magazine (h/t Howard Bashman) reports that the Justice has changed her mind about allowing cameras in the courtroom, while Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports on some controversy surrounding the Justice’s participation in a Pepsi-sponsored event for women who attended Yale. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:32 am
Carriers are still making money and the California market remains near a quarter of the entire nation's written premium.It's easy to say that SB 863 hasn't delivered on its promises - promises that should have saved the California system a half billion dollars in the first year but didn't.It's also easy to say that we still need to wait and see, as participants adjust to Independent Medical Review and other provisions that shocked the system.And… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
The blog’s Tom Goldstein will be presiding, and Lyle Denniston will be live blogging the event from the Peter Jennings Project moot court website. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
Adams 19-309Issues: (1) Whether the First Amendment invalidates a longstanding state constitutional provision that limits judges affiliated with any one political party to no more than a “bare majority” on the state’s three highest courts, with the other seats reserved for judges affiliated with the “other major political party”; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am
Coverage of Monday’s oral argument in Wittman v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
” Additional coverage comes from Bill Mears at Fox News, Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Nina Totenberg at NPR, Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Andrew Chung at Reuters, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, and Richard Wolf for USA Today. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
In his Sidebar column for The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes about the phenomenon of paid line standers at Supreme Court oral arguments. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
Lyle Denniston covered today’s orders for this blog, while Adam Liptak did the same for The New York Times, with coverage of Caetano from NPR’s Nina Totenberg. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:04 am
” Ellen Gilmer at Bloomberg Environment takes a close look at U,S. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell served as co-counsel to petitioner Eric Greene.] [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:46 am
” And at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Archis A. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
At NBC News (via How Appealing), Adam Edelman reports that Micheal Baca, “[o]ne of the “faithless electors’ at the heart of [the] case[,] says he’s ‘thrilled’ that the high court will take on the issue and has no regrets about how he cast his Electoral College vote for president — even though it went against the wishes of his state’s voters. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 5:27 pm
Segal, Jeannemarie O’Brien, Adam J. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that Dassey v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
” Lyle Denniston covered the opinion for this blog, and Tom Goldstein explained the ruling in Plain English. [read post]
