Search for: "Appeals Council"
Results 181 - 200
of 13,762
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2008, 1:38 am
Westminster City Council v IC and Others Court of Appeal “A judge did not have jurisdiction to make a declaration that a marriage based on lack of consent was not valid under English law, since such a marriage was voidable and not void ab intitio; the judge should have declared that the marriage was not recognised as a valid marriage in this jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:13 am
Ugiagbe v Southwark London Borough Council Court of Appeal “Failure to follow informal advice to go to a local housing authority's homeless persons unit when threatened with eviction, did not make an applicant intentionally homeless. [read post]
20 May 2008, 1:42 am
Moran v Manchester City Council Court of Appeal “Two women, who had been made homeless unintentionally when they fled to women's reguges from domestic violence, became homeless intentionally when they were evicted from the refuges as a result of their own misconduct. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:04 am
Gargett v Lambeth London Borough Council Court of Appeal “An applicant who had been in receipt of income and housing benefit and had been paid her housing costs had not been deprived of the right to seek discretionary housing payments for arrears of unpaid increased rent on the ground she had already received her housing costs [...] [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:34 am
Whether place of work unsafe Ellis v Bristol City Council Court of Appeal “A judge should consider the Code of Practice issued by the Health and Safety Commission when deciding whether a place of work was unsafe. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:19 am
Greenweb Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council Court of Appeal “Where a local authority compulsorily purchased a public open space after refusing the landowner's application for housing development, the Lands Tribunal had to value the land on the basis that planning permission had been granted for the housing development. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:52 am
Bolsover District Council v Dennis Rye Ltd Court of Appeal “A judge hearing a winding-up petition against a company, when faced with a cross-claim by the company against the petitioner, had to consider only whether the evidence before him was sufficient to satisfy him that the company's cross-claim was not merely arguable but was genuine and serious, [...] [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Barber v Croydon London Borough Council Court of Appeal “A local housing authority had acted unreasonably in seeking possession against a mentally impaired tenant for anti-social behaviour when it failed to take into account the possibility that his behaviour might have been produced by his mental impairment. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:25 am
Wandsworth London Borough Council v Webb Court of Appeal “It was not reasonable to make a possession order against a secure tenant on the ground that her son, who no longer lived with her, had been prosecuted and acquitted on three occasions of breaching an antisocal behaviour order. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T Court of Appeal “A child supervision order had an initial life of 12 months and could be extended for a further two years maximum. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 2:25 am
Hartlepool Borough Council v Llewellyn and Others Employment Appeal Tribunal “Male colleagues of female equal pay claimants were entitled to bring ‘piggyback’ claims using the female claimants as comparators and were able to recover sums equivalent to those awarded to successful comparators by way of arrears. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 2:41 am
Lambeth London Borough Council Queen’s Bench Division “A local authority housing officer who had refused a homeless person's application for housing could also decide her application for temporary accommodation pending appeal. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 12:11 pm
After his conviction, Mammadov appealed to the... [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 2:30 am
Fresh hearing not required Way v Poole Borough Council and Another Court of Appeal “The fact that a finding was made that a matter had to be remitted to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal on one discrete issue, did not mean that there should be a complete fresh hearing of all the issues which had been before the original tribunal. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:06 am
Ali v Birmingham City Council Court of Appeal “The words ‘inform’ and ‘notify’ did not necessarily mean the same thing. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:00 am
Gibson and Others v Sheffield City Council Court of Appeal “Merely because an employer could explain a pay disparity, which was not directly discriminatory, that did not necessarily mean that the pay practice was not tainted by sex discrimination, so that the employer would have to justify that disparity objectively in order to rely on the genuine material factor defence in an equal pay claim. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:18 pm
Zoning — Enactment of text amendment — Legislative action This case comes to this Court as an appeal by Siena Corporation (“Siena”), a Maryland corporation, and Rockville North Land, LLLP, a Maryland limited liability limited partnership, appellants, regarding the adoption of Zoning Text Amendment TXT2015-00239 (“Text Amendment”) by the Mayor and Council of Rockville (“the ... [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 2:05 am
Islington London Borough Council v Honeygan-Green Court of Appeal “An order for possession made against a secure tenant did not defeat her right to acquire a long lease of a tenanted flat; if the possession order had been discharged the tenant's right to acquire revived. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:34 am
Landlord discriminated against disabled tenant Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm Court of Appeal “A landlord who served a notice to quit on a secure tenant who had unlawfully sublet his premises and who was a disabled person unlawfully discriminated against the tenant. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:45 pm
Real property — Foreclosure proceeding — Response to discovery In this appeal from a civil action in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Amanda Boskent, appellant, challenges the court’s award of summary judgment to the Belvedere Council of Unit Owners (“Belvedere”) and Bank of America, N.A. [read post]
