Search for: "CERTAIN ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2014, 2:50 pm
However, the economic loss doctrine precluded recovery; plaintiffs didn’t allege a “special relationship” with Sony beyond those envisioned in everyday consumer transactions, so they couldn’t avoid the economic loss doctrine.As for negligent misrepresentation/innocent misrepresentation/negligent omission claims, they went down for various reasons (e.g., negligent misrepresentation is not available in Ohio for… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:36 pm
"Thus, according to the Court, plaintiffs suffered no economic loss.Comment: This case may well be appealed. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
Fortunately, several economic expenses can be claimed for the loss of your loved one. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
A plaintiff even may be satisfied by a lengthy "earn-out" related to certain customer business or a license fee for intellectual property in dispute. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 11:39 am
The conduct for which plaintiff contends Foster Wheeler should be held liable—plaintiff's alleged exposure to asbestos during the application of insulation to a boiler designed and manufactured by Foster Wheeler—occurred in Oklahoma in 1957, at a time when plaintiff was present in Oklahoma and was an Oklahoma resident. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
This property damage requirement may not be satisfied on the basis that coronavirus-tied losses resulted in a general decline in economic activity. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:36 pm
If that argument doesn’t work, the Maryland wrongful death act includes a provision to allow for economic losses by certain people if there is no parent, spouse or child of the deceased. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
” As stated in Stoneridge, citing Dura, in a private 10(b) action, a plaintiff must prove each of the following: "(1) a material misrepresentation or omission by the defendant; (2) scienter; (3) a connection between the misrepresentation or omission and the purchase or sale of a security; (4) reliance upon the misrepresentation or omission; (5) economic loss; and (6) loss causation. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:28 pm
As of Oct. 9, 2007, in the United States, the Company had been served or was aware that it had been named as a defendant in approximately 26,600 lawsuits, filed on or before Sept. 30, 2007, which include approximately 47,000 plaintiff groups, alleging personal injuries resulting from the use of VIOXX, and in approximately 264 putative class actions alleging personal injuries and/or economic loss. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Under Michigan law, there are caps on non-economic damages in certain cases, such as in medical malpractice claims and product liability cases. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Under Michigan law, there are caps on non-economic damages in certain cases, such as in medical malpractice claims and product liability cases. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:48 am
We took a Law and Economics course at the University of Chicago. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:25 pm
"Economic damages" means compensatory damages intended to compensate the plaintiff for actual economic or pecuniary loss. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 11:47 am
The loss of a loved one is as tragic as it is life-changing. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:00 am
To adequately state a claim under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, a plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to show: (1) a material misrepresentation or omission by the defendant; (2) scienter; (3) a connection between the misrepresentation or omission and the purchase or sale of a security; (4) reliance upon the misrepresentation or omission; (5) economic loss; and (6) loss causation. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:31 am
In addition, “non-economic damages” include a wide range of damages for which plaintiffs typically seek recovery. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 6:09 am
Plaintiffs normally sue defendants to recover for a loss they suffered. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:02 am
Workers’ Compensation: Mandatory insurance that almost all employers are required to hold in order to cover their employees for economic losses due to a job-related injury or illness. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:02 am
Workers’ Compensation: Mandatory insurance that almost all employers are required to hold in order to cover their employees for economic losses due to a job-related injury or illness. [read post]
2 Jul 2016, 5:18 am
App. at 815, the Supreme Court noted that non-economic evidence was not categorically inadmissible. [read post]
