Search for: "D. E.G. Y."
Results 181 - 200
of 749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
There is still plenty of time for editing, so we'd love to hear any recommendations you folks might have; in the meantime, you can read the entire PDF of the latest draft (though with some formatting glitches stemming from the editing process) here.] [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:22 pm
There is enormous curiosity (e.g.) about P.L. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:50 am
Thomas D. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
(d) The primary employer may facilitate the employment or affect the conditions of employment of such employees. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
State-Owned Enterprises: State of Play d. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:21 am
[D.] [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Une analogie peut être faite avec l’article 76 C.p.c. qui requiert l’envoi d’un avis au procureur général « à l’égard de toute question de légalité », y compris « lorsque la légalité d’un règlement est contestée au regard des règles du droit administratif »[21]. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 2:19 pm
(e.g., here, here, and here). [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 1:33 am
A referral on this topic may have come as a surprise to some, given the established case law of the Board of Appeal on plausibility and post-filed evidence (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, I-D-4.6). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:31 pm
See, e.g., Terry v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
[D.] [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:38 am
" (Decl. of D. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:53 pm
See, e.g., Imhaeuser v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:10 am
Quillen, Ogden D. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm
” In response, I’d say that the theoretical literature on this topic is fairly mature, and supports 2 clear conclusions. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:05 pm
But often we hear just a "10% of all X's account for 25% of all Y's" report, or some such, and are asked to infer from there that those 10% have a disproportionate propensity to Y. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:53 am
E.g., a country's parliament might pass a new law on June 1, 2010 to the effect that a given law (passed in 1950) has always meant X rather than Y, and this indeed would ostensibly nail down that, even back in 1950, it did indeed mean X not Y. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:24 am
Y case differently" or "Congress should amend Statute Z to say this" expect or even intend for the courts or Congress to pay heed. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Some conditions that develop after COVID (e.g. heart disease, diabetes, etc.) are chronic conditions that last a lifetime. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
The term “SRE” expenditures means research or experimental expenditures that are paid or incurred by the taxpayer during a tax year in connection with the taxpayer’s trade or business.[18] The TCJA removed the SRE expense election and instead required SREs to be charged “to capital account” and amortized over either 5 years (for domestic research) or 15 years (for foreign research).[19] Taxpayers should therefore carefully review (x) whether they have an SRE… [read post]