Search for: "DOES 1-98 " Results 181 - 200 of 2,156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2015, 4:21 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” Article L. 112-1 specifies that the law “protects the rights of authors in all works of the mind, whatever their kind, form of expression, merit or purpose. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 2:45 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
In turn, OLG Düsseldorf upheld the defendant’s claim, invalidated the design and dismissed the infringement claim (20 U 98/17). [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 10:25 am
"[T]o be considered documentary,' evidence must be unambiguous and of undisputed authenticity" (Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 86; see Cives Corp. v George A. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
The accidental identity of the boiling temperatures in different examples does not disprove this finding. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Claim 1 of the main request read: 1. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 7:00 am
Second, that, due to the extraordinary Court of 1993-98, the Court’s performance improved from the period 1940-1985 to the period 1986-2005. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 10:47 am
  The government may be jumping to conclusions here, though -- just because 98 percent of the returns checked by the IRS have turned out to be wrong, and just because on average her customers underpaid by $3,167, does not make her a fraud. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:08 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
But it also referred to Article 98 of Regulation No 40/94, which provides: Article 98  Sanctions 1. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, it does not automatically follow from the said statement that priority claims should be acknowledged if the selection inventions in question are considered not “novel”. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]; CPLR 3211[a][1], [7]). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:24 am by ADeStefano
Morse Diesel, Inc. (98 AD2d 615 [1st Dept. 1983]), that a permanent staircase is not a safety device within the meaning of Labor Law 240(1), is consistent with decisions from the other three Appellate Departments. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
With respect to appeals in opposition proceedings, a similar provision is contained in R 98 (corresponding to previous A 106(2) EPC 1973).[1.5] It is the board’s understanding of this legislative framework that R 84(1) does not apply to the situations regulated by the separate legal provisions of Rule 75 and R 98 EPC. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, this does not make the above adverse effect any more acceptable. [read post]