Search for: "Doe Officer 1"
Results 181 - 200
of 52,187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2007, 3:32 am
Does 1-21, the Boston case brought by the RIAA to obtain the identities of 21 Boston University students, a motion to vacate the ex parte discovery order, and the subpoena issued pursuant to that order, has been made by one of the students.The student is represented by Raymond Sayeg of the Boston office of multi-state law firm, Denner Pellegrino.Linares Declaration Submitted by RIAA in support of ex parte discovery order motion*Consolidation order*Memorandum of Law in… [read post]
12 May 2023, 12:15 am
Code § 202(b)(1)(A). [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
A source does exist. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 12:16 pm
Simply because an OCF-1 is not detailed does not mean that it’s deficient. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:56 am
LEXIS 1 (January 3, 2008): It must be acknowledged, of course, that an individual who has been instructed by a police officer to perform field sobriety tests has the power to prevent the tests by refusing to cooperate, but that power does not equate to a constitutional right to refuse. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 8:36 am
PLAINTIFF JANE DOE 1 ( PLAINTIFF DOE 1 ) was at all relevant times herein an individual female residing in the County of Sacramento. 2. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:31 am
We conclude that it does and, accordingly, reverse. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 2:36 am
A Few Features The new Office does feature the ability to save to a pdf, but Adobe would not let Microsoft include that feature in the product. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 6:16 am
The police officer who allegedly assaulted Jane Doe was eventually fired. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:02 pm
The district court just does not find credible one officer’s assertion that he smelled marijuana after his fourth trip up to the passenger window. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:44 am
The proposed definition is reprinted below in full. **** § 275.202(a)(11)(G)-1 Family offices. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding and Plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.The Appellate Division disagreed with Plaintiff's contention that Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) does not apply to the records demanded held by the custodian, explaining:1. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding and Plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.The Appellate Division disagreed with Plaintiff's contention that Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) does not apply to the records demanded held by the custodian, explaining:1. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm
Vilches-Navarrete, 523 F.3d 1, 13 (1st Cir. 2008) (“As we have said before, the Fourth Amendment does not apply to activities of the United States against aliens in international waters. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:25 am
An officer does not have to let a person walk away from a stop with RS without a frisk. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:32 am
Ofc. #1 doesn’t show up for the hearing. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:28 am
In my humble opinion, NBC’s The Office is the world’s #1 employment law training aid. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 11:23 am
What does this all mean to you? [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 6:41 pm
” Section 541(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 4:11 am
Consent once removed does not permit an informant to invite in the police. [read post]
