Search for: "Does 1 through 17"
Results 181 - 200
of 9,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 11:35 am
Flood, Rake and Rumpole: Mavericks for Justice--Purity and Impuity in Legal Professionalism, in Law, Lawyers, and Justice: Through Australian Lenses 17. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:35 am
Flood, Rake and Rumpole: Mavericks for Justice--Purity and Impuity in Legal Professionalism, in Law, Lawyers, and Justice: Through Australian Lenses 17. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 2:21 am
The University seeks the Court's permission to serve the attached interrogatories on Plaintiffs and conduct telephonic depositions of the individuals who investigated the seventeen John Does named in this lawsuit to determine 1) what their investigative practices are and 2) whether they have any additional information with which to identify the John Does. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 3:29 pm
Collection of previous "practice tips", through 1/20/09. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:18 am
It’s not required, but most of us are used to marching through the analysis in the same way the statute does. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:41 am
The KitKat trade mark (as reported in the CJEU decision- the photocopier has not been kind)By now, the fate of the four fingered KitKat shape mark is old news - Joined Cases C‑84/17 P, C‑85/17 P and C‑95/17 P Rumours of the mark’s death have been greatly exaggerated - it is now for the EUIPO to reconsider the evidence in light of the CJEU's ruling and reach a decision as to whether or not the mark is valid.Whilst the press may have… [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
New Jersey – Plaintiff Christopher Sadowski is suing Defendant Restoration 1 By J&D, LLC, of New Palestine, Indiana, over violation of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
The most useful book I’ve found so far does not mention lawyers at all, but it does review an enormous amount of research. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:22 am
The issue: “(1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
Roberts, NO. 08-13753, 2009 WL 714329 (11th Cir., Mar. 19, 2009) it again affirmed that Booker does not apply to resentencings under § 3582(c)(2) pursuant to § 1B1.10(b)(1), id. at *1. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:11 pm
In their letter, the 255 members of Congress note that the TRID rule does not provide lenders an opportunity to start using the new disclosures before the August 1 effective date, and that the inability of lenders to test their systems and procedures ahead of time increases the risk of unanticipated disruptions on August 1. [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:23 am
Following a report by the Justice Committee, the Bill passed Stage 1 on November 5, 2008. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:33 pm
From 1996 to 2001, tens of millions of dollars in cash was withheld in this manner.The District Court found that the unpaid taxes cannot be considered "proceeds" of mail fraud because such tax savings (1) represented a percentage of unreported gross receipts that had been procured through lawful activity (the day to day business of the Supermarket) and, thus, could not be categorized as "proceeds" from an unlawful activity; and (2) were merely retained, rather… [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 10:55 am
04:17 – JZ Well, the two most prominent cases that I see, (1) is what we call unsuitable investments, which means that the investment is not appropriate for you, the customer, given your investment experience and your background and your financial status. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 7:00 am
The Russian leadership does not want democracy to be seen as a preferable alternative to the Russian system of governance, and, through disinformation, Russia can highlight cracks in society that make the West seem chaotic and unappealing. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 3:32 am
Doe 1", presumably through consolidation), provides a much more orthodox and correct analysis of the requisites for infringement of the 17 USC 106(3) distribution right than does Judge Karas's analysis in Elektra v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
The statutory duty to intervene and report went into effect on December 1, 2021. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:56 am
Connecticut is not one of those states; neither is New Jersey.(4) Usually, the doctrine, where it does exist, applies to minors who are at least 16 years old and have an understanding of the related medical procedure which, in most cases, is not serious.(3) http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/07/justice/connecticut-teen-chemo/index.html http://www.vox.com/2015/1/8/7513423/why-a-17-year-old-with-cancer-is-being-forced-to-undergo-chemo… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 1:00 pm
But, what if the lex fori does not provide rules as to the transfer? [read post]
17 May 2007, 8:17 pm
Mail Launches Unlimited Storage (2007-05-16) Is it just me or does Google feel more evil every day? [read post]
