Search for: "Does 1-141" Results 181 - 200 of 993
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2010, 7:21 pm by MacIsaac
The application of Rule 24-1(14) simply does not come into play. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 9:00 am
 Please R.S.V.P. by 2/2/07 to annualdinner@cpc-nyc.org or (212) 941-0920 ext. 140 or 141.Thursday, February 22, 2007, 6:00 P.M. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:00 pm
Bankruptcy does not mean that the bankrupt party ceases to be a debtor of non-verifiable claims. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:59 am by SHG
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 8-9 (1968), Katz v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
Does it matter that most innovative activity, at least in the United States, is taking place in a small number of venture capital funded locations? [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" Note: NYPPL, after reviewing this decision, is of the opinion that although Fennelly may not be entitled to increases in the supplemental benefit  pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-a(2) in the amount of "the salary increases given to [Eastchester's] current fire chief," to the extent Fennelly's does not receive adjustments in the nature of a supplement to his retirement allowance or pension consistent with the reasons**and procedures described… [read post]
22 May 2007, 5:15 am
  The provision requests but does not require an advisory vote on executive compensation. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 6:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
Though the hack does make it theoretically possible for users to play pirated games, it does not have that feature at this time. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:30 pm
What we do hold is case specific; that is, wherever may be the location of the bright line that separates the shareholders’ bylaw-making power under Section 109 from the directors’ exclusive managerial authority under Section 141(a), the proposed Bylaw at issue here does not invade the territory demarcated by Section 141(a). [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 8:34 am
Miss Scinto did not respond to this notice, so on 30 April 2003 Newham served a second notice under s. 141(1) (the judgment refers to 140(1) on this point, but that must be a typo, see [9]). [read post]
As of December 14, 2017, the FTC website listing docketing events for this case (https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/141-0200/1-800-contacts-inc-matter) has not been updated since November 16, 2017, and therefore does not indicate whether 1-800 Contacts filed a timely appeal to the Commission. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:30 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Kaiser Aluminium (as contained in Para 118 thereof) that if the arbitration is not an International Commercial Arbitration as per Section 2(1)(f), the court does not have any choice but to decide the dispute as per Indian substantive law is not applicable in case of arbitrations seated outside India. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:30 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Kaiser Aluminium (as contained in Para 118 thereof) that if the arbitration is not an International Commercial Arbitration as per Section 2(1)(f), the court does not have any choice but to decide the dispute as per Indian substantive law is not applicable in case of arbitrations seated outside India. [read post]