Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 181 - 200
of 12,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2017, 12:10 am
In such circumstances, and in so far as that rebuttable presumption is not rebutted, the act of posting a hyperlink to a work which was illegally placed on the internet constitutes a ‘communication to the public’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:52 am
The second is Case C-466/12 Svensson, a reference from the Svea hovrätt (the Svea court of appeal is one of the six appellate courts in the Swedish legal system) asking the CJEU to address the following questions: If anyone other than the holder of copyright in a certain work supplies a clickable link to the work on his website, does that constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC ...? [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:18 am
§ 203(s)(1)(A) and 29 C.F.R. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 11:18 am
This revision does not change the reporting deadline for the 2016 EEO-1 Report, which is due on September 30, 2016. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:08 am
§ 2615(a)(1) (emphasis added). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
Princeton University and Sciences Po Law presented Synesthesia of Law Sept. 29 (evening) to Oct. 1, 2016, at Princeton. [read post]
3 May 2006, 1:09 am
" The court noted that "the Secretary of Labor has promulgated a regulation — 29 C.F.R. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 5:13 pm
Affirming a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register, the Board found the mark PROGRAMMED PROTEIN to be merely descriptive of "medical research services relating to DNA and gene synthesis. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:41 am
The NPDB has a report that lists all of medical malpractice paid claims against all Tennessee health care providers between September 1, 1990 through November 29, 2009, a period one month short of 20 years. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 6:15 am
The Supreme Court has therefore asked the CJEU to answer the following questions (please note that this is my own translation from Swedish):Does the leasing of cars, equipped with a radio receiver, mean that the leasing company, is a user who provides a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 or a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 8(2) of Directive 2006/115, respectively? [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
This notwithstanding, the Board notes the following in respect of the corresponding submissions of the [patent proprietor]:[2.1.1] According to claim 1 of the Druckexemplar sent together with the communication pursuant to R 71(3) dated December 14, 2007, including pages 27 to 29 (claims) dated November 19, 2007, the radical R² is only “optionally” substituted by 1 to 5 hydroxyl groups. [2.1.2] In response to said communication the applicant has, of its own… [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:11 am
On December 29, 2017, the Standardization Administration of China, jointly with the PRC General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, issued the Information Security Technology – Personal Information Security Specification (GB/T 35273-2017, “Specification”), which officially came into effect on May 1, 2018. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 9:18 am
In another update to the preliminary injunction issued August 29 in the Apotex case, The Fire of Genius writes that there are two interesting things to note about Judge Stein's decision: (1) it nowhere mentions the eBay v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 11:51 pm
On the other hand, absence because of the employee's use of the substance, rather than for treatment, does not qualify for FMLA leave. 29 C.F.R. 825.114(d). [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
As stipulated in the Regulations, where a contract does not specify a phased amount, the partial release of holdback payment must be made on an annual basis.[17]Prompt Payment Regulations, s. 2(1). [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:43 pm
§ 213(a)(1). [read post]
6 May 2008, 4:30 am
Sec. 1051(a)(1) and Trademark Rule 2.52. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 1:47 pm
Dec.29 2011) where the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Both agree with the decision, but add their own twists to the case. 1. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
If Question 1 is answered in the negative: 2.1 Does a scheme establish 'fair compensation' for the purposes of Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC if the right specified in Question 1(a) applies only where recording media are marketed to natural persons who use the recording media to make reproductions for private purposes? [read post]
