Search for: "Does 1-58" Results 181 - 200 of 2,932
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm by familoo
What does the amendment actually say and do and how does it change the existing law? [read post]
20 May 2019, 11:00 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Pursuant to Rule 99(1)(a) EPC, the notice of appeal shall contain inter alia the name and the address of the appellant as provided in Rule 41, paragraph 2(c).Rule 101(2) EPC further specifies that in case the Board of Appeal notes that the appeal does not comply with Rule 99(1)(a) EPC, it shall communicate this to the appellant and shall invite him to remedy the deficiencies within a period to be specified. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court, however, does not agree with their interpretation. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Guido Paola
Elle sera introduite par la division dans le druckexemplar et ainsi que les corrections de typographie nécessaires dans le texte de la requête subsidiaire";et ensuite que:"la présidente de la division d'opposition demande alors à chacune des parties si elle souhaite s'exprimer, ce à quoi les parties répondent par la négative".2.3 Selon l'article 113(2) CBE, l'Office européen des brevets n'examine et ne… [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 7:07 pm
It should be noted that, with very rare exceptions, the British ColumbiaWills Act does not recognize holograph wills as valid wills.Mr. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 8:30 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
CFPB recently issued its Spring 2019 Semi-Annual Report to Congress covering the period October 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm
Kennametal does not contest that, with the exception of combining ruthenium binders with PVD coatings, claim 5 of Grab expressly recites all the elements of pending claim 1. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:53 pm
See Jensen, The Founding of a Nation: A History of the American Revolution, 1763-1776, 155-58, 258, 377-78 (1968); Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, 300-303 n. 1 (1st ed. 1868). [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 5:03 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
  Accordingly, the Supreme Court found that the use of the EUTM by the Defendant had become misleading within the meaning of Art 58(1)(c) UMV, and the EUTM was declared revoked. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 5:03 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
  Accordingly, the Supreme Court found that the use of the EUTM by the Defendant had become misleading within the meaning of Art 58(1)(c) UMV, and the EUTM was declared revoked. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 10:34 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Depending on how it is set up, it could be a more dignified way to make one's exit.The bill takes effect November 1. [read post]