Search for: "Expressions Originals, Inc"
Results 181 - 200
of 4,004
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2014, 6:45 am
This post originally appeared on the Law, Justice and Journalism website and is reproduced with permission and thanks [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm
Asylum, Inc. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:09 am
Reed Properties, Inc., 2017 WL 2713047 June 23, 2017). [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 2:51 pm
Accord Healthcare, Inc., 38 F.4th 1013 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 7:52 am
Case in point - Wal-Mart Stores Inc. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 8:41 am
Triangle Services Inc., 06 Civ. 7858 (S.D.N.Y. - 9/17/07). [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 9:26 am
Merpel expressed her surprise at the quantum of the damages award of US$2o million. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
Concrete Express, Inc. began performing road repair work in May 2009 near the High Street Lofts in Boulder. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am
IMS Health Inc. (2011) (the commercial expression case) and the plurality opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:43 am
See, e.g., Google, Inc. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:45 am
Learning Curve International, Inc., No. 08-1296 (7th Cir. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm
The case is North Jersey Media Group Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 3:48 am
In other words, the difference between SOF and "soft" is not "sufficient to avoid encumbering use of the original word." [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 11:04 am
The case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, INC., v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
This means that even though the expression may be new (as the Foundation argued), it, by itself, is not enough to deal with the first factor. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
This means that even though the expression may be new (as the Foundation argued), it, by itself, is not enough to deal with the first factor. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 10:40 am
Given that Hospira, Inc. was the original cross-appellant on the issues to be addressed, Hospira’s en banc brief is due 45 days from the date of the order. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 4:50 am
Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:52 am
The case is Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:52 pm
Xio Interactive, Inc., the judge ruled that Xio infringed upon Tetris’ copyright and trade dress. [read post]
