Search for: "Graham, Appeal of" Results 181 - 200 of 1,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2009, 7:56 am by LaBovick Law
"The court of appeals correctly construed the second clause of the “public disclosure” bar contained in 31 U.S.C. 3730(e)(4)(A). [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 12:01 pm by Simon Lester
So here's my question for Tom Graham, Dennis Shea, or any other former or current USTR official: Should there be DSU Article 11 appeals on any or all of the three issues noted above? [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
Cooper, 747 S.E.2d 398 (North Carolina Court of Appeals 2013). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 6:38 am by Chris Hugan
I usually just asked Alexander Graham Bell. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:57 am
Diversity education effort results in allegations of “intentional infliction of emotional distress”Graham v Guilderland CSD, App. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:30 am
Thanks to How Appealing, we can all read this interesting article by Lawrence Hurley in The Daily Journal of California, which is headlined "U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 9:47 pm
"Our position was simply that his 10 year registration ran out a long time ago," Lafayette attorney Bruce Graham, who represented McCown on appeal, said today. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Fire District imposed the penalty of termination of Graham’s employment with the district.Graham appealed and the Appellate Division vacated the penalty imposed, termination, because it annulled some, but not all of the charges, filed against Graham. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:42 pm by Patent Docs
The program, which will be presented by Graham Bell of Cubicibuc Ltd., David L. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 5:15 am by Jerry Cohen
It took 13 years thereafter for the Supreme Court to breathe life into PHOSITA in the Graham v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 5:15 am by Jerry Cohen
It took 13 years thereafter for the Supreme Court to breathe life into PHOSITA in the Graham v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:59 am
Over at The Recorder, Scott Graham has been doing some serious excavation into the backgrounds of 9th Circuit nominees: see Friedland, Owens Fill in the Plot on Ninth Circuit Nominations. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 11:59 am by Robert Kreisman
The court of appeals found Graham’s testimony also satisfied Federal Rule 702’s relevance requirement. [read post]