Search for: "Gravely v. U.S. Department of Justice" Results 181 - 200 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The Department of Justice (DOJ) said in a press release, "The lawsuit marks the first time that the United States has filed an action to forfeit antiquities that are foreign assets of ISIL. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:07 pm by Steve Vladeck
Fortunately, there are dozens of U.S. databases that will support and assist even this kind of limited vetting within: the State Department; the Department of Homeland Security; the National Counterterrorism Center; the Terrorist Screening Center; the FBI, the intelligence community and the Department of Defense. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am by Andy Wright
In a Dec. 31, 2020 brief, the Justice Department defended Vice President Pence against a suit filed by Rep. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, the Second Circuit concluded that “it would gravely distort the doctrine of qualified immunity to hold that a school official should fairly be said to ‘know’ that the law forb[ids] conduct not previously identified as unlawful. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm by Mark Ashton
Department of State if a U.S. child is detained for four years while the Italians decide whether the American courts can fairly dispose of a custody proceeding? [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm by Brianna Rauenzahn
The Justice Department cited the Supreme Court’s reasoning in FDA v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Free Speech Coal., 535 U.S. 234, 236 (2002) (citing Stanley v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Court of Justice of the European Union Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
Neville, York University – Department of Communications. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:39 am
  The Justice Department produced sworn statements by all of the top echelon of intelligence officials contending that this would pose grave risks of exposing national security secrets, and would divert vital officials from their wartime tasks. [read post]