Search for: "J. C. SMITH"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
C. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 68, 2024).Linda C. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 3:21 am
(C.), 2013 CarswellOnt 3851 (SCJ), P. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 4:24 pm
Gibson The USB Maine Conspiracy — Kenneth C. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Smith. 22 Journal of Law & Policy 483-766 (2014). [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 10:27 am
Galston, Kenneth Einar Himma, Andrew Koppelman, Samuel C. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:37 pm
Turning to damages, Green J awarded £10,000, the maximum permissible under the summary procedure of DA 1996, s 9(1)(c). [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 1:58 am
(c) The Competitions to be open to all enrolled members of the Guide Association in Australia. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
John J. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Smith & Robert W. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:17 am
Brooks, Ricardo J. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 8:11 pm
Smith supports the Swedish approach. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:11 am
Professor Robert J. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(b) and (c) relating to commonly owned inventions, Congress needed 433 words. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:51 am
J. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:45 am
Joining him on this case were Smith Valliere attorneys Timothy Valliere and Marvin Ben-Aron.Also playing a major role in the insurers' defense were Craig J. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
Peter J. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 3:51 pm
Smith, Jenner & Block LLP Carol Steiker, Howard J. and Katherine W. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:44 am
Smith, Hugh E. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
Anyway this, Alberto's 56th weekly summary, reads as follows:* Green J quashes UK private copying regulationsA few weeks ago Green J issued a judgment concerning the recently-introduced UK exception for personal copies for private use, concluding that it does not currently envisage a fair compensation requirement [here]. [read post]
