Search for: "Jane Does 1-3" Results 181 - 200 of 809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
The Massachusetts Attorney General apparently declined even to investigate those allegations.In September, 2015, plaintiff filed a complaint against the following defendants: 1) Maura Healey (`Healey’), the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 2) Steven Hoffman (`Hoffman’), the Deputy Chief of the Medicaid Fraud Division at the Office of the Attorney General, 3) Chris Cecchini (`Cecchini’), an investigator at the Office of the Attorney General,… [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:18 pm by Paul Maharg
  Review of Research in Education, 3, 1, 3-42.↩ [3]Cassirer, E. (1946). [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:49 am
Footnote 3 on page 4 notes that (a)(1)(B) allows but does not mandate taking into account the child's contributions. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 6:01 am by Silver Law Group
” The SEC protects whistleblowers’ confidentiality and does not reveal identifying information about them. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:48 pm
Notably, unlike a Section 32(1) claim for infringement of a registered trademark, a Section 43(a) claim does not require "use in commerce. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:53 am by Andis Kaulins
Rightly seen, he and his entire department would - in fact - be working for the rest of their lives at Jane Doe's former company in order to create the profits needed to pay for the court's award of damages to Jane Doe. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 10:00 am by Jeff Vail
 In Colorado, it is possible though difficult to sue anonymously by filing suit under a pseudonym such as "John Doe" or "Jane Roe. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am by Steve Vladeck
Jane already flagged the merits brief filed by the U.S. government on September 17 in al Bahlul v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:40 am by Petrelli Previtera, LLC
Example 1: Misunderstanding of Retirement Accounts Distribution of retirement accounts is an often misunderstood asset. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 1:29 pm
I speculated here that the order they would consider the counts was: 1-4-5-1-2-3. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
If the answer to Question 3 is "no," would Connecticut afford defendant Jane Doe qualified immunity or no immunity at all? [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:25 am by Cari Rincker
The elements of a contract are as follows: (1) Offer; (2) Acceptance; (3) Legal purpose of the agreement; (4) Meeting of the minds; (5) Consideration; and, (6) Competent parties. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
I wrote about the Complaint in November, and included this excerpt (which is of course just the plaintiffs' side of the story): [1.] [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On May 21, 2014, Thomson filed a pro se lawsuit in Florida against Jane Doe, an anonymous individual who posted a review on Thomson’s Avvo profile. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:45 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
For example, suppose candidate John Smith were to claim that his opponent, incumbent Jane Doe, "would be in favor of budget measures that would cost individual taxpayers up to $3,000. [read post]