Search for: "John Doe Correction Officer #2" Results 181 - 200 of 1,116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But does that mean Pennsylvania corrections officials violated clearly established law when, the weekend before a prisoner's trial, they refused to let him use the main law library or lend him paper copies of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence? [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 7:00 pm
(Legal Theory Lexicon 018: Justice) In that entry, we divided the general topic of justice into four parts: (1) distributive justice, (2) corrective justice, (3) political justice, and (4) procedural justice. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Ron Coleman
” from the above — because what does the cited provision of the TMEP say? [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 10:36 am by David Urban
  The police officer, John Ellins, argued that a subsequent delay in his receiving authorization for a 5% pay increase amounted to retaliation for his engaging in these speech activities. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relists. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by admin
  Does the process smack of desperation … or merely uncertainty? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:19 am by Susan Brenner
Even if our hypothetical rogue law enforcement officers are so determined to “get” John Doe that they break the law knowing they can be prosecuted (and are), that doesn’t do anything to help John Doe. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 11:30 am
" The 2-1 ruling came Friday in Parker, et al., v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Mark also notes my continuing interest, perhaps obsession, with Federalist 2, where John Jay preposterously argues that Americans are alike in religious sensibilities. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm by John Floyd
Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 427 n.25 (1976), that prosecutors are ‘bound by the ethics of [their] office to inform the appropriate authority of after-acquired or other information that casts doubt upon the correctness of the conviction. [read post]