Search for: "Lehman Brothers" Results 181 - 200 of 2,372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 5:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Background Lehman Brothers issued over $31 billion of debt securities between July 2007 and January 2008. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 5:24 am by INFORRM
While most of us don’t trust journalists, many of us are still under the illusion that we have a free and independent press. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:26 am by Broc Romanek
As the Treasury Department’s financial research director, Richard Berner, pointed out recently, “when Lehman Brothers failed six years ago, its counterparties could not assess their total exposures to Lehman. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:28 pm by Kevin
 See “Search of Lehman Brothers E-Mails Suggests Words, Phrases to Avoid” (July 15, 2010) (suggesting that terms such as “big trouble,” “the real objectives,” and “probably going to get punished” are best avoided in emails). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:20 pm by Philip R. Stein
For example, a higher percentage of mortgage buyback suits are now brought by entities, like ResCap/RFC, Lehman Brothers Holdings, and the various failed institutions for which the FDIC  is acting as Receiver, that long ago ceased to do business—and now function primarily as “litigation machines. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:20 pm by Philip R. Stein
For example, a higher percentage of mortgage buyback suits are now brought by entities, like ResCap/RFC, Lehman Brothers Holdings, and the various failed institutions for which the FDIC  is acting as Receiver, that long ago ceased to do business—and now function primarily as “litigation machines. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 11:00 pm by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm by Charlie Rosenthal
The New York Times called it “unnerving” and “bizarre,” comparing the swing to the drop in bond yields that occurred when Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:52 am by Nick Dyson, Olswang LLP
The first appellant, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc, is the ultimate parent company for the Lehman Brothers group. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v Lomas & Ors and other cases, heard 17-20 October 2016. [read post]