Search for: "Li v. Holder" Results 181 - 200 of 445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Chris Coulter and Mercedes Samavi
  This determination was re-affirmed in a recent Advocate General opinion in Copydan Båndkopi v Nokia C-463/12. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Only one unreversed Supreme Court majority opinion has upheld a content-based speech restriction on strict scrutiny grounds — last year’s Holder v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 2:38 pm by Eleonora Rosati
They differ substantially from copyright scenarios because of the absence of holders of large right portfolios who could trigger a snowball effect by notifying long lists of protected subject matter. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
Agents changed the contents of files, lied to customers, and committed other dishonest and fraudulent acts in order to meet financial goals. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:17 am by Matthew Belcastro
Four-Year Statute of Limitations The distinction was addressed in the leading case of Dubin v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:50 am by Ronald London
   This may ultimately set up a dichotomy vis-à-vis whether liability lies and/or damages are available between cases involving targeted credit card theft resulting in fraudulent charges that account-holders learn about and react to, versus inadvertent or other types of more generic data breaches. [read post]