Search for: "Luban"
Results 181 - 200
of 257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2010, 9:04 am
Fourth, notice that people like Wasserstrom, Gerald Dworkin, David Luban, and even our own Brad Wendel and Alice Woolley (not to mention our commenter extraorinaire Patrick O'Donnell), to name just a few, have special insights about the ethical justifications for lawyering that they might not have about, say, the law of retail commerce. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 12:33 pm
., the Pepper - Luban debate), and we'll provide a bibliography to that literature, but for present purposes we need to write an accessible sketch that gets the conversation going without being too simplistic. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:01 pm
(Thanks to my colleague and co-blogger David Luban for bringing the Améry to my attention.) [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
” Briefly: At Balkinization, Marty Lederman and David Luban weigh in on the government’s cert petition in Hargan v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 12:53 pm
David Luban is the Frederick Haas Professor of Law and Philosophy at Georgetown University's Law Center and Department of Philosophy. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
I would define cause lawyers, to paraphrase David Luban, as lawyers who hold themselves morally accountable for the ends they pursue on behalf of clients. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:47 am
For example, I think the perspective of David Luban, or of Bill Simon, would tend to orientate more towards decision in context than towards the application of a rule across circumstances. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:12 pm
David Luban has written a remarkable post on the intellectual bankruptcy of the hypothetical, but that, of course, doesn't lessen the likelihood one whit that one of the bloviators--perhaps George Stephanopalous seeking to assure his audience that he's not a Democratic hack--will ask the question. [read post]
26 May 2024, 5:23 am
Reaction Should Not Include Sanctions by Todd Buchwald What the ICC Prosecutor Charged – and Didn’t Charge – in Gaza Warrants by David Luban (@DavidLuban) Sec. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:15 am
My response follows.David Luban's critique of my article grossly misleads your readers, to put it very mildly.First, he seizes on a one-sentence fragment of my multipoint analysis of the Margolis memo and pretends that it's my whole argument. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:18 am
As David Luban has argued, the rule of law manifests an attitude of respect by the governors toward the governed. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
Among prominent commentators, David Luban (int'l humanitarian law), Scott Horton (law of warfare), and Jack Balkin (con law) have this expertise, but I really don't. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am
Suzanne Luban co-teaches Stanford Law School’s Criminal Defense Clinic as the Clinical Supervising Attorney and Lecturer in Law. [1] The last Johnson domino to fall? [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:09 am
David Luban’s thoughtful essay on the morality of targeted killing in the Boston Review last week is among the more balanced pieces I’ve come across on the topic, and unquestionably worth reading. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 3:18 pm
But they are, contra Galanter and Luban, nonetheless a rebuke of the defendant that involves elements of both public censure and punishment, albeit of a civil, not criminal, kind. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
David Luban, What Makes a War? [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:18 am
” My correspondent is referring to this piece I wrote back in June, along with more recent follow-ups after the election, this debate on the subject between David Luban and Daniel Byman, as well as related material on Just Security (see pieces by Luban, Oona Hathaway, and David Kaye). [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:19 am
There is also, as Luban notes, a strong element of path-dependence in service. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:22 am
As David Luban correctly notes, “the DTA prohibit CIDT by the United States everywhere on the planet, it prohibits loophole lawyering to evade the ban. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:00 am
I agree with both David Luban and David Bosco that the OTP will proceed cautiously and deliberately in both cases. [read post]
