Search for: "MAPP v. COURT" Results 181 - 200 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 5:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On the consent of the People and pursuant to People v Dunaway, Mapp v Ohio and People v Huntley, a hearing was held in this matter on 19 October 2012. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant's Motion to Suppress or Preclude Evidence Defendant's motion for a Huntley/Mapp/Dunaway/Payton hearing is granted. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:57 am
In People v Kalikow, 2011 NY Slip Op 09452 Decided on December 23, 2011 Appellate Division, Fourth Department, the defendant had received an appearance ticket for having an open container of alcohol. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:09 am by Sina Kian
In light of the history outlined in Parts I and II, Part III reexamines three of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions regarding the adjudication of civil liberties – Mapp v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by Deborah J. Merritt
Colorado 1949); and that the exclusionary rule likewise applies to the states (Mapp v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:23 am
  How Cardozo ridiculed it, and how the Supremes may get their chance to play with Mapp v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:23 am
Supreme Court adopted this principle - known as the exclusionary rule - in 1961 in Mapp v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant's motion to preclude impeachment evidence, People v Sandoval 34 NY2d 371 (1974), and evidence-in-chief of prior bad acts, People v Ventimiglia 52 NY2d 350 (1981), is referred to the trial court for hearings immediately prior to trial. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Sarapin, Troy University: Toward a Causal Explanation of ‘The CSI Effect’: Self-efficacy as Mediator between Fictional Crime-TV Exposure and Verdict Certainty Joseph Sery, University of San Francisco: ‘Fruit from the Poisonous Tree’: The Rhetorical Strategy behind Mapp v. [read post]