Search for: "MILLER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 181 - 200 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
District Court for the District of Columbia to entertain a challenge to a determination by the U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:04 am
But what was not similarly clear in the hearing on District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 9:54 am
Additionally, are there particular market facts and circumstances where the approach established by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Polygram Holding, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:18 am by Scott Bomboy
For example, the District of Columbia Voting Rights amendment missed its seven-year deadline in 1985, with only 16 states ratifying. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Change to ‘consisting of’ language during reexam limits damages: Kim v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
When last I wrote on this website about the plan, around two years ago, elected legislatures in eight states (Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Washington, Vermont and California) and the District of Columbia—comprising 132 electoral college votes altogether (almost half the needed 270 votes)—had adopted the idea. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
To date, the legislatures of ten states and the District of Columbia—which collectively account for 165 electoral college votes, well more than half of the 270 needed for the NPV bill to become effective—have passed laws to adopt the measure. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:46 am by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
Supreme Court revisited the issue in the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]