Search for: "Mike Rounds" Results 181 - 200 of 1,419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am by Conor McEvily
  At the Huffington Post, Mike Sacks describes the Justices as “relatively muted” during the argument in CompuCredit, in which the Court is considering whether claims under the Credit Repair Organizations Act are subject to arbitration, while Robert Barnes of the Washington Post reports that the argument “launched the justices into round after round of questioning on essentially the same point. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am by Adam Chandler
(Nabiha collected the early commentary in her round-up yesterday.) [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
Rounding out coverage of the Term’s cases, the Washington Post’s T.W. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:30 am by John Steele
UPDATE: Mike Dorf (Cornell) thinks the government's case against Edwards is pretty strong. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 9:26 am
It's Monday morning, and as usual, I'm rounding up ideas for posts. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 4:43 pm
  It was the first time each member of the team had competed, yet they managed to secure an arbitrator judge's vote in each of the two rounds. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:18 pm
" The Moderate Voice• Obama Girl Does Street Battle With Her Nemesis: Radio Free Mike:• The YouTube Effect: CNN/YouTube 2008 Democratic Presidential Candidates Debate: Jewels in the Jungle (We should have it Germany)• "The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my ideological match:" The Duck of Minerva [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:37 am by sally
” Podcast Charon QC, 24th February 2011 Source: www.charonqc.wordpress.com “Charon QC” is the blogging pseudonym of Mike Semple Piggot, editor of insitelaw newswire. [read post]
8 May 2008, 9:24 am
  The Fort Worth Star-Telegram carries Mike Graczyk's AP dispatch, "Aug. 14 execution date for Texas 7 member. [read post]
11 May 2012, 8:28 am by Joshua Matz
Continuing with cases in the cert. pipeline, Mike Francis of The Oregonian reports on a cert. petition asking the Court to review whether family courts can consider income from veterans’ benefits when calculating spousal support. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by Nabiha Syed
Mike Dorf of Dorf on Law explains how the decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
” At HuffPost Live, experts join Mike Sacks to discuss some of the big legal stories of the week, including the latest developments in the challenge to the University of Texas’s use of race in its undergraduate admissions process and the settlement of Mount Holly v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:09 am by Kiran Bhat
The Associated Press, Sarah Kliff of the Washington Post’s Wonkblog, and Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post also have coverage. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:54 am by Kali Borkoski
” At the BLT, Mike Scarcella reports on a recent decision by the D.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Nabiha Syed
At the Huffington Post, Mike Sacks disputes what he describes as the “most persistent myth about Justice Thomas – that he is Justice Antonin Scalia’s puppet. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by Nabiha Syed
Mike Dorf of Dorf on Law reacts to Justice Scalia’s denial on Fox News that the Court “is political at all”; Dorf asserts that “the fact that Justices occasionally surprise us by deviating from the ideological script hardly shows that political ideology isn’t doing most of the heavy lifting. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
At Pro Publica, Kara Brandeisky and Mike Tigas track the status of state voting laws since the Court’s decision earlier this year in Shelby County v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:50 am by Amanda Rice
” At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf “unpack[s] a somewhat technical piece of Justice Scalia’s dissent,” in which he “could be saying . . . that the plaintiffs in a properly defined class action would lack standing” because “no one can know in advance that his treatment or non-treatment will amount to cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
Over at The Originalism Blog, Mike Rappaport responds to a recent essay by Michael Paulsen defending the Chief Justice’s opinion in the healthcare case. [read post]