Search for: "Montana Water Court" Results 181 - 200 of 487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2017, 9:24 am by Native American Rights Fund
State of Montana (Water Compacts)News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.htmlIn the Sacred Places section, we feature articles about the Trump administration's decisions to revoke and replace Bears Ears National Monument. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:24 am by Native American Rights Fund
State of Montana (Water Compacts)News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.htmlIn the Sacred Places section, we feature articles about the Trump administration's decisions to revoke and replace Bears Ears National Monument. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:51 am by DONALD SCARINCI
New Mexico: The case involves a long-running water dispute over the Pecos River, which runs between the two Southern states. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:01 am by Scott Bomboy
And last week, the Washington state attorney general filed a Supreme Court petition asking review of a federal appeals court decision. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 10:02 am by Erin McCarthy Holliday
A federal judge in Montana on Thursday granted a temporary injunction bringing an immediate halt to the construction of the $8 billion Keystone XL pipeline project. [read post]
10 May 2023, 1:55 pm by NARF
Peneaux (Domestic Abuse; Effect of Tribal Court Conviction) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2023.html Kelek v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm by Unknown
H.R.7240 - Fort Belknap Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Act of 2024 / To achieve a fair, equitable, and final settlement of claims to water rights in the State of Montana for the Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Reservation of Montana, and for other purposes. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:14 pm by NARF
Oklahoma) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html Brice v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:29 pm by Unknown
Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Water Rights)Fredericks v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:11 am by Unknown
Hoopa Valley Tribe (Clean Water Act) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlSwiger v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Supreme Court Rejects Montana's River Ownership Claims - lawprof Richard Frank via the Legal Planet blog, with his thoughts on the PPL Montana decision. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 2:04 pm
Thompson, Jr., to be a Special Master to prepare recommendations for action by the Court in a case in which Montana is suing Wyoming and North Dakota in a dispute over use of water from the Yellowstone River and tributaries, under a 1950 interstate compact. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
The grandchildren of Montana can rest easy: The Act does nothing of the sort. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:01 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Chaudhuri (Indian Lands - Restricted Fee Status)Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.html Timbisha Shoshone Tribe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 7:27 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Monday morning read: Biden lawyer who defended affirmative action grapples with diversity in her own office (Tobi Raji & Theodoric Meyer, The Washington Post) Supreme Court Cases May Impact Child Welfare, Water Rights for Montana Tribes (Denali Sagner, The Flathead Beacon) Buying face time: A secret invite list shows how big donors gain access to Supreme Court justices (Mattathias Schwartz, Jack Newsham, & Katherine Long, Business Insider)… [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 12:10 pm by Amy Howe
Department of Defense, which arises out challenges to a June 2015 rule, promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency, that defines the term “waters of the United States” for purposes of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:01 pm by Rick Hasen
“The court today recognized that burdening ATP and other citizen groups with unnecessary, intrusive, and unwarranted regulations on speech is an affront to the First Amendment. [read post]