Search for: "PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC."
Results 181 - 200
of 3,177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
Tribble, a U.S. citizen and stock promoter; How Wai Hui (a.k.a. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:07 am
The cause for fibromyalgia is unknown and the Public Citizen’s group claims that the risks of Savella far outweigh its benefits. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:05 am
Inc., or Sernak Farms, based in Weatherly, Penn., to settle allegations that Sernak engaged in discrimination on the basis of citizenship status by preferring to hire temporary visa holders over U.S. citizen applicants and adversely treating its U.S. citizen employees. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 5:41 am
Obviously, it is important for court cases to generally be available to the public so that citizens can "keep a watchful eye on the workings of public agencies. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:53 am
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.htmlUpstate Citizens for Equality, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 3:30 am
Americold Realty Trust v ConAgra Foods, Inc. presents just the kind of question I might have faced on a final examination in that course: in what states is a trust a “citizen” for purposes of diversity jurisdiction? [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:57 am
Based on the record before us, we conclude that Rialto Citizens has public interest standing. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:21 am
A $180,000 wrongful termination settlement that Foothill Packing, Inc. just paid to settle Department of Labor charges illustrates the potential Catch-22 tightrope that employers must walk when choosing between citizens and resident aliens with visas for hiring and firing decisions. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:30 am
Mid–Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc., 704 F.2d 125, 129 n. 8 (1983), the Fourth Circuit has recognized a quasi-sovereign interest of a State in bringing an action to enforce its laws, disgorge the proceeds of ill-gotten gains, and refund them to its citizens. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:30 am
Mid–Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc., 704 F.2d 125, 129 n. 8 (1983), the Fourth Circuit has recognized a quasi-sovereign interest of a State in bringing an action to enforce its laws, disgorge the proceeds of ill-gotten gains, and refund them to its citizens. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Stutts, 521 S.W.2d 575, 576 (Tenn. 1975), where we wrote: It is the settled law in this state that private citizens, as such, cannot maintain an action complaining of the wrongful acts of public officials unless such private citizens aver special interest or a special injury not common to the public generally. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:34 am
” Citizens United, 558 U.S. at 352. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:33 am
Power, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:32 am
We reported last May on the FCC’s adoption of preliminary rules for the Citizens Broadband Service at 3550-3700 MHz. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
(“Fitch”), and the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 6:01 pm
(emphasis added) (para. 4) The Court of Appeal’s decision in Alford reflects how the public interest standing rules have evolved since the public standing trilogy of Thorson, McNeil and Borowski first effectively recognized that individual citizens might gain standing to challenge legislation or administrative action, despite having no special or direct interest in the matter at issue. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 10:25 am
Chevron USA, Inc. et al., 5:03-CV-264 (E.D. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:04 pm
Specifically, after re-evaluating the Supreme Court's standing analysis in Friends of the Eartch, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
The legislature, therefore, had no authority to make an act divesting one citizen of his freehold, and vesting it in another, without a just compensation.8 The Dorrance court keenly appreciated the constitutional limitations on the legislature’s power to take for public use, further noting: The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:24 am
In a case following a familiar trade-secret set of facts, on April 28, 2020, the Texas First District Court of Appeals in Houston reversed the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss under the Texas Citizens Participation Act (“TCPA”) in National Signs, Inc. v. [read post]
