Search for: "Party X" Results 181 - 200 of 6,702
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2016, 7:39 am by Cleve Clinton
Dutifully gathering all emails, invoices and transport documents with X-Tra Green, Ezeeout comes across the parties’ master sales agreement. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
Also, if you've correctly sensed the "affinities," an amazing amount of progress can take place while the group members interact with each other during mediator's caucuses with other parties - i.e., you come back into the room, and the group that, collectively, was willing to put in $X as their share now presents a contribution of $X+. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:11 am by Christopher Simon
So assume that Company X has stated their safety screening policy for their truck drivers and you want to impeach their safety director with the old standards. [read post]
20 May 2009, 2:36 am
The fact that it did not ought to be a matter of concern for the party. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 7:56 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
App’x 512 (7th Cir. 2018) (unpublished) (a) Facts: The parties were divorced in Illinois. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:09 pm by Walter Olson
“For any value of x, ‘X’s Law’ is a bad idea. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:22 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
He was found guilty of counterfeiting and selling counterfeit works, and was ordered to indemnify the Rodin Museum in Paris, a civil party to the case, for infringement of the author's moral rights. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm by Giles Peaker
On factors for the court to consider, the Court of Appeal cited with approval the Bar Council’s list: (i) the form of ADR being considered, (ii) whether the parties were legally advised or represented, (iii) whether ADR was likely to be effective or appropriate without such advice or representation, (iv) whether it was made clear to the parties that, if they did not settle, they were free to pursue their claim or defence, (v) the urgency of the case and the reasonableness of… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 3:37 pm
Agents 1 and 2 regard X and Y as good, but X and Y is considered by both parties to be less good than their original principles or sets of values and policies. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Both parties were litigants-in-person, and, by the time the proceedings came to trial before Saini J, there remained ambiguities about the parties’ cases, and in particular, precisely which publications were in issue. [read post]
14 May 2009, 10:24 pm
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the proceedings.) [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 10:00 pm
But if the worry is party-based, then why stop at DOMA cases? [read post]