Search for: "Party X v. Party Y"
Results 181 - 200
of 477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
That's its effect, and even if you say that X doesn't do Y, if it does, then Y's the rule. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:13 am
. ____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences … [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
Statutory Rape: On the other hand, in People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:11 pm
The court of appeals began with an example clearly demonstrating that non-infringing comparative advertising can still be false advertising: an ad stating that “In a blind taste test, 9 out of 10 New Yorkers said they preferred Brand X Coffee to Brand Y Coffee. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
X transfers his X-1 property to Miss Y, and Miss Y transfers her Y-1 property to Mr. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:59 am
After all, the government's choice of whether to take Parcel X or to take Parcel Y for a new public school is recognized as an exercise of the "power" of eminent domain; and if the government chooses to take Parcel X, it is, by necessity, refraining from taking Parcel Y. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:41 pm
There are tons of cases in which I think the correct legal result is X even though my ideological desire is Y. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:47 am
The Morgan Court thus indicated that, even though an authorized buyer of product X was free of the patent owner’s patent on that product, the buyer could not, by virtue of his purchase, prevent the patent owner from enforcing his patent as to product Y, even though Y was specifically designed to be used with X and, at a minimum, made X more useful than it otherwise would be and, indeed, was essential to X’s utility. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:07 am
Is the fact that Person X contributed $100 to Candidate Y likely to reveal interests to whom Candidate Y will be beholden? [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 9:49 am
Att'y Grievance Comm'n, 519 U.S. 946 (1996) (denying); Foe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:31 pm
A New York Probate Lawyer said this case is a contested probate proceeding wherein the petitioner, A, the decedent’s second wife, moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 3212 granting summary judgment admitting the proffered instrument dated 21 December 2005 to probate and dismissing the objections filed by three of the four of decedent's children from his first marriage, X, Y and Z. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:35 am
If a law makes something illegal in situation X, but not in situation Y, is it always/sometimes/never necessary for the police to have probable cause to believe that X, and not Y, is the case? [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am
Wang dated 17 March 2016D48 Supplemental declaration of Y. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
However, the license was subject to two exceptions, namely to: use the polygons (including the associated geometry, namely x,y co-ordinates) for a purpose other than personal, non-commercial use or commercial or non-commercial use within your organisation; or sub-license, distribute, sell or make available the polygons (including the associated geometry, namely x,y co-ordinates) to third parties. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
As illustrated most recently in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:09 pm
We accept that it's okay for NY to apply different tax rates to X and Y if X earns $100,000 in 2010 while Y earns $100,000 in 2011 because NY can change its tax rates, even though it's not okay for NY to tax X and Y at different rates if they both earn $100,000 in 2010, even though they live in different towns. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:43 am
"offers to settle all claims by plaintiff X against defendant Y").- Offers of settlement can be withdrawn during the 14 day statutory period by service of a written withdrawal of offer. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm
At the relevant time, the Kurdistan Democratic Party (“KDP”) was the effective ruling party of the KRG which governed the Kurdish controlled areas of Iraq. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 11:30 am
How can you defend “x”? [read post]
