Search for: "Refuse Materials, Inc."
Results 181 - 200
of 3,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2010, 7:37 am
Ironically, the Obama administration has refused to release documents that were generated by the Bush administration. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 12:02 pm
The court refused to enter an order that would have such an effect. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Apple Inc., February 7, 2024, Rochon, J.).Proxy statement. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 6:22 am
MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
The claimant relied on the decision of the Victorian Supreme Court in Trkulja v Google Inc (No 5) ([2012] VSC 533) in which Beach J held that The jury were entitled to conclude that Google Inc intended to publish the material that its automated systems produced, because that was what they were designed to do upon a search request being typed into one of Google Inc’s search products. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
Wellness Support Network, Inc., 2011 WL 1303419 (N.D. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm
The court decisions “Browne v Medford Multicare” and “Smith v TWA, Inc” dealt with workers who refused return to modified work. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 1:16 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:52 am
Servs., Inc., 129 S. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:06 am
Category: FYI Body: Today's term comes from Connecticut General Statutes § 22a-248 (2011): Litter: "Litter" means any discarded, used or unconsumed substance or waste material, whether made of aluminum, glass, plastic, rubber, paper, or other natural or synthetic material, or any combination thereof, including, but not limited to, any bottle, jar or can, or any top, cap or detachable tab of any bottle, jar or can, any unlighted cigarette,… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:19 am
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:28 am
Patent and Trademark Office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has affirmed a PTO examiner's refusal to register the trademark "Verde" to Verde Power Supply Inc., saying the proposed trademark as used in connection with the company's goods is only descriptive. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 3:17 pm
Desktop Direct, Inc. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
In May 2010, Family Dollar Stores, Inc. and CPSC announced the recall of about 1.8 million Auto Fire Target Sets because Henry Gordy refused to conduct the recall. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 3:42 am
In re Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc., Serial Nos. 85389360 and 85389763 (May 30, 2014) [not precedential]Wal-Mart teaches us that product configurations can never be inherently distinctive. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 4:04 am
In this enervating, yet precedential, decision, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark shown below, for "choke seals" and "choke seals for electric cables," finding "reasonable and correct" Examining Attorney David Taylor's requirement that applicant disclose the material composition of its goods so that they could be properly classified. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
Because of the procedural failure, the TTAB refused to consider the materials presented — finding that Mr. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:01 pm
In re South Park Cigar, Inc., Serial No. 78486382 (February 1, 2007).In a well-reasoned and careful opinion, the Board began by pointing out that, under the CAFC's California Innovations decision, the proper basis for refusal of a geographically deceptive mark is not Section 2(a) but Section 2(e)(3). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 3:05 am
Experian Information Services, Inc., Appeal No. 10-2281 (8th Cir. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:34 am
In the recent decision of Laguna Construction Company, Inc. v. [read post]
