Search for: "Religious Dept."
Results 181 - 200
of 299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
(Religious Freedom Restoration Act; Ayahuasca) Eagle Bear, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, the Court of Appeals, quoting Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, said that "To promote open government and public accountability, FOIL* imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
Implementation of the program would result in scholarships being used in religiously affiliated schools, but the no-aid provision prohibited any aid to “sectarian schools. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Slip Op. 03764 (2d Dept.,2019) Supreme Court, in effect, directed the defendant to provide the plaintiff with a Get (a Jewish religious divorce decree) prior to receiving any distribution of marital property. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 1:18 am
Subscription Required
NASSAU COUNTYFamily Law
Free With Registration: Mother's Religious Belief Against Children's Immunizations 'Genuine,' Qualify For Exemption
Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Services v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:46 am
” This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s argument in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:18 am
Dept. of Health and Human Services on Obama's health care reforms â€â [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:10 pm
Facebook, Google, Yahoo to remove religiously objectionable content by Feb 6 - http://goo.gl/KoL2i Starbucks' cup of woe: $7.5 million civil award http://bit.ly/vBCgWl Lawyers for Rob Ford ask court to overturn audit of election expenses - Globe and Mail http://bit.ly/d62xgF Dismantling of Righthaven appears under way with loss of website - http://goo.gl/5xT3P Justice Dept. rejects South Carolina voter ID law, calling it discriminatory (Jerry… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:29 am
New York City Dept. of Education U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:04 am
Dept. of Child Services and Child Advocates, Inc. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
Oregon Dept. of Agri-culture, 553 U. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 8:36 pm
Dept. of Public Health, 798 N.E.2d 941 (Mass. 2003.) [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
For the latter reason, the applicants argue that the Order is not neutral and generally applicable for purposes of Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:48 pm
., the police dept.). [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
EEOCDocket: 10-553Issue(s): Whether the ministerial exception, which prohibits most employment-related lawsuits against religious organizations by employees performing religious functions, applies to a teacher at a religious elementary school who teaches the full secular curriculum, but also teaches daily religion classes, is a commissioned minister, and regularly leads students in prayer and worship.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for… [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 3:06 am
Third, city residents were recruited to serve as volunteers from community organizations, religious groups, schools, unions, and the private sector. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Badger Catholic, Inc.Docket: 10-731Issue(s): Whether, absent evidence of religious animus, a public institution of higher education that has created a limited public forum to promote its educational mission may refuse to fund a student organization's activities that the organization identifies as religious worship, proselytizing, or inculcation of a particular religious belief.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (7th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:14 am
This Court’s decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
During the jury screening, Jean Finney’s counsel asked whether prospective jurors were affiliated with “a religious organization growing up where it was taught that people who are homosexuals shouldn’t have the same rights as everyone else because it was a sin. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
And I urge you not to miss the paragraph they ended with: In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
