Search for: "SAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC." Results 181 - 200 of 400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 11:42 am by Colin Zick
In the FTC’s first case focused on the privacy and security of genetic information, the FTC alleges that San Francisco-based Vitagene, Inc. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
Zimmerman (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) District Court C D California: IsoHunt told to pull .torrent files offline, likely to close: Columbia Pictures Industries Inc., et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Kentucky: Was this award for counsel fees ‘exceptional’ or less? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Kentucky: Was this award for counsel fees 'exceptional' or less? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Kentucky: Was this award for counsel fees 'exceptional' or less? [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 7:14 am by Kristian Soltes
Brazil Antitrust Watchdog Questions Facebook’s WhatsApp Payment FeesReuters – July 27, 2020 Brazil’s antitrust watchdog is asking Facebook Inc (FB.O) to explain the fee structure for its short-lived payments service launched in June in partnership with card processor Cielo SA (CIEL3.SA), according to a document seen by Reuters. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 3:59 am by Administrator
Son jugement n’est pas conforme au cadre d’analyse établi dans Transax Technologies inc. c. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:25 am
SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Limited has now metamorphosed into Case C-406/10 and the questions -- which the Kat still can't find anywhere on the Curia website -- are helpfully listed on the website of the UK's Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IP finance)   Australia Trade mark use: We need a more balanced solution – FCA decision in Alcon v Bausch & Lomb (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCA on trade marks as security for costs: Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt (ipwars) Minister for Innovation decides not to change regulatory regime for books – publishers keep territorial exclusivity (LawFont) (Managing Intellectual Property) Non-English language publications may not be citable art: APO… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench) Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority [2010] EWHC 208 (QB) (09 February 2010) Moore v Hotelplan Ltd (t/a Inghams Travel) & Anor [2010] EWHC 276 (QB) (22 February 2010) Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd [2010] EWHC 375 (QB) (11 February 2010) Law Society of England and Wales v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWHC 352 (QB) (26 February 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Sharafi & Anor v Woven Rugs Ltd &… [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-05-27 https://t.co/ZSkhV4vKH2 -> Bankruptcy stays injunctive relief claim for copyright Syndic de Pigeat, 2017 QCCS 2043 https://t.co/djLsM4Acad -> Default judgment grants for blank levy royalties Canadian Private Copying Collective v Redpact Impex 2017 ONSC 3038 https://t.co/wYO9Db99X4 -> Tech transfer agreement transferred all rights in patents Composite Technologies Inc. v. [read post]