Search for: "Sears Holdings, Inc."
Results 181 - 200
of 213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Thus, the Operating Engineers decision that "you can't do this" will inure to the benefit of product manufacturers of all sorts defending against consumer fraud claims - much better than a mere extraterritoriality decision not addressing the merits of the claims would have been.And this holding is ironclad. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:13 am
Orgain, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IP Dragon) Amendments to the PRC patent law (IP Frontline) Ethiopia Ethiopia streamlines trade mark formalities (Afro-IP) Europe Blind readers seek guarantee of access under EU copyright law (Intellectual Property Watch) CFI dismisses Philip Morris' appeal against OHIM's persistent refusal to register the shape of its cigarette packet as a community trade mark (IPKat) CFI rules PAST PERFECT not descriptive for musical recordings: TIM The International Music Company AG,… [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
This post is by my colleagues Gail Lees, Andrew Tulumello, Chip Nierlich, Mark Whitburn and Chris Chorba. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
Google, Inc. will likely run into some especially significant barriers, no pun intended. 3. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:17 pm
The article quotes Stephen Sears, chairman of the petroleum engineering department at Louisiana State University as saying, "Typically, a very good well in the Gulf can produce 30,000 barrels a day, but that's under control. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:10 am
She has spent time as a federal prosecutor, a law firm attorney and in-house counsel at several major corporations, including MCI Communications Corp. and Sears, Roebuck & Co. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., Civil Action No. 07–11944–DPW, 2013 WL 4812425 (D. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Sears Roebuck, 421 U.S. 132, 150-53 (1975)(recognizing the deliberative process privilege, but limiting it to pre-decisional documents); EPA v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 386 F.3d 21, 35 (1st Cir. 2004)(holding that trial court erred in allowing crossexamination and final argument on expert witness’s supposed failure to produce all working notes and videotaped recordings while conducting tests, when objecting party never made such document requests). [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 647 A.2d 454 (N.J. 1994). [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 9:51 am
Sears Roebuck Co. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
Same for Sears v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:01 am
By postponing payments, insurance companies can hold money longer and make more on their investments — and often wear down clients to the point of dropping a challenge. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
At times, the judiciary’s resistance to delving into the factual underpinnings of expert witness opinions is extraordinary. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 08-10761 (11th Cir. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
According to the AP story, “Sears is one of the companies using apps. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
-Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, writ denied) for “holding that a summary-judgment movant was not required to prove the requisites for accelerating a note because there was no specific denial of conditions precedent i [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
