Search for: "Special Education of Appeals" Results 181 - 200 of 4,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2016, 7:50 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Bethpage terminated Eskridge’s .4 probationary appointment in the special education tenure area effective February 28, 2012, thereby reducing her employment with the district to a .6 tenured part time position in the special subject tenure area of education of deaf children. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:16 am by Jim Gerl
  This has become one of the hottest of hot button issues in special education law. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:57 am by Texas RioGrande Legal Aid
Approximately 36,000 children in the San Antonio area participate in special education programs. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 3:45 am
Tom F. affirmed the decision on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upholding the ruling that a parent of a student with a disability may seek reimbursement for a unilateral placement in a private school even though the student never received special education services from the public schools. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:56 am by Steve Lash
The Court of Special Appeals said the trial judge was wrong to toss out the jury’s verdict against the Prince George’s County Board of Education based on his erroneous finding that it owed no duty of care to the girl and that her negligent crossing of the street contributed to her death. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 12:16 pm
Last month, however, the Court of Special Appeals gave a more thorough explanation about when Shenker applies — and, as to be expected, it’s not as broad as disgruntled shareholders might hope. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
# # #DECISIONMatter of Suffern Educ. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:53 am
In the broader context though , special education law is new law. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by hjmarcus
., Jan. 21, 2011): This is one of the latest in the rather familiar category of cases addressing whether a child who engages in unacceptable conduct should be classified and provided with special education services. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 3:03 am
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit [official website] on Thursday dismissed [opinion text] a claim brought by the mother of a special education student that her child's Fourth and Fourteenth amendment [text] rights were violated when he was given "timeouts. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 2:30 am
Fresh hearing not required Way v Poole Borough Council and Another Court of Appeal “The fact that a finding was made that a matter had to be remitted to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal on one discrete issue, did not mean that there should be a complete fresh hearing of all the issues which had been before the original tribunal. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 2:00 pm by Steve Lash
A public school district’s failure to follow proper procedures in handling parents’ requests for special services does not violate federal disability law if the child is nevertheless provided a free appropriate public education, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday in a case involving Prince George’s County Public Schools. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:37 am by Jim Gerl
  I hope that all of the different types of special education stakeholders who read this blog find the information in this series helpful.Procedural safeguards are extremely important under our system of special education. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:08 am by Jim Gerl
This is the sixth installment in a multi-part series on procedural safeguards under the federal special education law, the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:05 pm by Jim Gerl
There are only ten decisions on special education law by the U S Supreme Court, so it was a big deal last October when the high court requested briefs on a stay put appeal from the Justice Department. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:51 am by Admin
Note: Please keep in mind that this article is provided for information and educational purposes. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:22 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” The Commissioner of Education dismissed Pronti’s appeal noting that “[o]n the record before me, [Pronti] has failed to meet her burden of establishing that the duties of the newly-created position are similar to those of the Director of Special Education, for purposes of Education Law §2510(3)(a). [read post]